Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Syed Atif Hasan NaqviDepartment of Plant Pathology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4235-2074
Shehzad IqbalFaculty of Agriculture Sciences, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile.
Hafeez-Ur-RehmanDepartment of Plant Pathology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan.
Umar FarooqDepartment of Plant Pathology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan.
Muhammad Zeeshan HassanDepartment of Plant Pathology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan.
Muhammad Nadeem ShahidDepartment of Plant Pathology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan.
Adnan Noor ShahDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0040-0253
Aqleem AbbasCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9174-9700
Iqra MubeenKey Lab of Integrated Crop Disease and Pest Management of Shandong Province, College of Plant Health and Medicine, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266300, China.
Ammara FarooqThe Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Sargodha Campus, The University of Lahore, Sargodha 40100, Punjab, Pakistan.
Rehab Y GhareebPlant Protection and Biomolecular Diagnosis Department, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, Borg El-Arab 21934, Alexandria, Egypt.
Hazem M KalajiDepartment of Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3833-4917
Abdulwahed Fahad AlrefaeiDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3761-6656
Mohamed A A AhmedPlant Production Department (Horticulture-Medicinal and Aromatic Plants), Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7929-968X
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Evaluation of Bacterial Perpetuation Assays and Plant Biomolecules Antimicrobial Activity against Cotton Blight Bacterium · full record | OpenQuestion