Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631613›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Dexamethasone-Loaded Ureasil Hydrophobic Membrane for Bone Guided Regeneration.

Rafaella Moreno Barros, Camila Garcia Da Silva, Kammila Martins Nicolau Costa, Arnóbio A Da Silva-Junior, Cássio Rocha Scardueli, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici Marcantonio, Leila Aparecida Chiavacci, João Augusto Oshiro-Junior

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rafaella Moreno BarrosPharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Center for Biological and Health Sciences, State University of Paraíba, Av. Juvêncio Arruda, S/N, Campina Grande 58429-600, Paraíba, Brazil.
Camila Garcia Da SilvaDepartment of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Highway Araraquara-Jaú, Araraquara 14801-902, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kammila Martins Nicolau CostaPharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Center for Biological and Health Sciences, State University of Paraíba, Av. Juvêncio Arruda, S/N, Campina Grande 58429-600, Paraíba, Brazil.
Arnóbio A Da Silva-JuniorDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte-UFRN, Natal 59012-570, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7516-1787
Cássio Rocha ScardueliFaculty of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara 14801-385, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosemary Adriana Chiérici MarcantonioFaculty of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara 14801-385, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5052-7439
Leila Aparecida ChiavacciDepartment of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Highway Araraquara-Jaú, Araraquara 14801-902, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Augusto Oshiro-JuniorPharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Center for Biological and Health Sciences, State University of Paraíba, Av. Juvêncio Arruda, S/N, Campina Grande 58429-600, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7247-1598
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical barrier membranes have been used to release active substances to treat critical bone defects; however, hydrophilic membranes do not present a prolonged release capacity. In this sense, hydrophobic membranes have been tested. Thus, this study aimed to develop hydrophobic membranes based on mixtures of ureasil-polyether-type materials containing incorporated dexamethasone (DMA) for the application in guided bone regeneration. The physicochemical characterization and biological assays were carried out using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), an in vitro DMA release study, atomic force microscopy (AFM), a hemolysis test, and in vivo bone formation. The swelling degree, SAXS, and release results revealed that the u-PPO400/2000 membrane in the proportion of 70:30 showed swelling (4.69% ± 0.22) similar to the proportions 90:10 and 80:20, and lower than the proportion 60:40 (6.38% ± 0.49); however, an equal release percentage after 134 h was observed between the proportions 70:30 and 60:40. All u-PPO materials presented hemocompatibility (hemolysis ≤2.8%). AFM results showed that the treatments with or without DMA did not present significant differences, revealing a flat/smooth surface, with no pores and/or crystalline precipitates. Finally, in vivo results revealed that for both the commercial hydrophilic membrane and u-PPO400/2000 (70:30) after 60 days, the bone formation volume was 21%. In conclusion, hybrid membranes present unique characteristics for treating critical bone defects, considering the delayed and prolonged release results associated with the physical barrier capacity.

Indexed as

critical bone defect sizehydrophobic membraneorganic–inorganic hybrid materials

Identifiers

PMID35631613
PMCPMC9146579
OpenAlexW4280557120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.