Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631602›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Regeneration of Articular Cartilage Using Membranes of Polyester Scaffolds in a Rabbit Model.

Maciej Baranowski, Monika Wasyłeczko, Anna Kosowska, Andrzej Plichta, Sebastian Kowalczyk, Andrzej Chwojnowski, Wojciech Bielecki, Jarosław Czubak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Polyethersulfone Polymer for Biomedical Applications and Biotechnology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maciej BaranowskiDepartment of Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gruca Orthopaedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Konarskiego 13, 05-400 Otwock, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9717-5274
Monika WasyłeczkoNalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering PAS, Księcia Trojdena 4, 02-109 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8925-292X
Anna KosowskaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Warsaw, Chałubińskiego 5, 02-004 Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej PlichtaFaculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, 3 Noakowskiego Str., 00-664 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-2627
Sebastian KowalczykFaculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, 3 Noakowskiego Str., 00-664 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9372-3122
Andrzej ChwojnowskiNalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering PAS, Księcia Trojdena 4, 02-109 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6691-074X
Wojciech BieleckiDepartment of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Live Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6430-6792
Jarosław CzubakDepartment of Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gruca Orthopaedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Konarskiego 13, 05-400 Otwock, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2358-8735
Grochowski Hospital · PLInstitute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering · PLWarsaw University of Technology · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education (CMKP), Marymoncka 99/103, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland. 501-1-18-23-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One promising method for cartilage regeneration involves combining known methods, such as the microfracture technique with biomaterials, e.g., scaffolds (membranes). The most important feature of such implants is their appropriate rate of biodegradation, without the production of toxic metabolites. This study presents work on two different membranes made of polyester (L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone-PLCA) named "PVP and "Z". The difference between them was the use of different pore precursors-polyvinylpyrrolidone in the "PVP" scaffold and gelatin in the "Z" scaffold. These were implemented in the articular cartilage defects of rabbit knee joints (defects were created for the purpose of the study). After 8, 16, and 24 weeks of observation, and the subsequent termination of the animals, histopathology and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) examinations were performed. Statistical analysis proved that the membranes support the regeneration process. GPC testing proved that the biodegradation process is progressing exponentially, causing the membranes to degrade at the appropriate time. The surgical technique we used meets all the requirements without causing the membrane to migrate after implantation. The "PVP" membrane is better due to the fact that after 24 weeks of observation there was a statistical trend for higher histological ratings. It is also better because it is easier to implant due to its lower fragility then membrane "Z". We conclude that the selected membranes seem to support the regeneration of articular cartilage in the rabbit model.

Indexed as

articular cartilagecartilage regenerationcartilage tissue engineeringpoly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone)rabbitregenerative medicinescaffolds

Identifiers

PMID35631602
PMCPMC9143412
OpenAlexW4229374366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.