Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631594›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-TNF Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.

Silvia Marquez-Megias, Ricardo Nalda-Molina, Javier Sanz-Valero, Patricio Más-Serrano, Marcos Diaz-Gonzalez, Maria Remedios Candela-Boix, Amelia Ramon-Lopez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Research progress on biologics and therapeutic drug monitoring in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding the therapeutic toolkit for inflammatory bowel disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Treatment Landscape.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia Marquez-MegiasSchool of Pharmacy, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Ricardo Nalda-MolinaSchool of Pharmacy, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7183-6372
Javier Sanz-ValeroDepartment of Public Health and History of Science, School of Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University, 03550 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8735-0075
Patricio Más-SerranoSchool of Pharmacy, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0547-5975
Marcos Diaz-GonzalezAlicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), 03010 Alicante, Spain.
Maria Remedios Candela-BoixVirgen de la Salud General Hospital of Elda, 03600 Elda, Spain.
Amelia Ramon-LopezSchool of Pharmacy, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ESHospital General de Elda · ES

Funding

Miguel Hernandez University "Ayudas a la contratación de personal investigador en formación 2021"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infliximab and adalimumab are monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) used to manage inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) has been proven to prevent immunogenicity, to achieve better long-term clinical results and to save costs in IBD treatment. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review on cost-effectiveness analyses of studies that apply TDM of anti-TNF in IBD and to provide a critical analysis of the best scientific knowledge available in the literature. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). Cost-effectiveness of the TDM strategies was presented as total costs, cost savings, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Thirteen studies that examined the health economics of TDM of anti-TNF in IBD from 2013 to 2021 were included. Eight of them (61.5%) achieved a score between 17 and 23 on the CHEERS checklist. The comparison between the TDM strategy and an empirical strategy was cost saving. The ICER between reactive TDM and an empirical strategy was dominated (favorable) by reactive TDM, whereas the ICER value for proactive TDM compared to an empirical strategy ranged from EUR 56,845 to 3,901,554. This systematic review demonstrated that a TDM strategy is cost-effective or cost-saving in IBD.

Indexed as

adalimumabcost–benefit analysiscost-effectivenessdrug monitoringinflammatory bowel diseasesinfliximabpharmacokineticstumor necrosis factor inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35631594
PMCPMC9145467
OpenAlexW4229369896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.