Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631576›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Semi-Automated Therapeutic Drug Monitoring as a Pillar toward Personalized Medicine for Tuberculosis Management.

Rannissa Puspita Jayanti, Nguyen Phuoc Long, Nguyen Ky Phat, Yong-Soon Cho, Jae-Gook Shin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rannissa Puspita JayantiCenter for Personalized Precision Medicine of Tuberculosis, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-1965
Nguyen Phuoc LongCenter for Personalized Precision Medicine of Tuberculosis, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-0546
Nguyen Ky PhatCenter for Personalized Precision Medicine of Tuberculosis, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Korea.
Yong-Soon ChoCenter for Personalized Precision Medicine of Tuberculosis, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Korea.
Jae-Gook ShinCenter for Personalized Precision Medicine of Tuberculosis, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Korea.
Inje University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2018R1A5A2021242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard tuberculosis (TB) management has failed to control the growing number of drug-resistant TB cases worldwide. Therefore, innovative approaches are required to eradicate TB. Model-informed precision dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) have become promising tools for adjusting anti-TB drug doses corresponding with individual pharmacokinetic profiles. These are crucial to improving the treatment outcome of the patients, particularly for those with complex comorbidity and a high risk of treatment failure. Despite the actual benefits of TDM at the bedside, conventional TDM encounters several hurdles related to laborious, time-consuming, and costly processes. Herein, we review the current practice of TDM and discuss the main obstacles that impede it from successful clinical implementation. Moreover, we propose a semi-automated TDM approach to further enhance precision medicine for TB management.

Indexed as

clinical decision support systemmodel-informed precision dosingpersonalized medicinetherapeutic drug monitoringtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35631576
PMCPMC9147223
OpenAlexW4229019904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.