Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631493›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Redesigning of Cell-Penetrating Peptides to Improve Their Efficacy as a Drug Delivery System.

Ildikó Szabó, Mo'ath Yousef, Dóra Soltész, Csaba Bató, Gábor Mező, Zoltán Bánóczi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Tweaking the NRF2 signaling cascade in human myelogenous leukemia cells by artificial nano-organelles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ildikó SzabóMTA-ELTE Research Group of Peptide Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.
Mo'ath YousefDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3971-592X
Dóra SoltészDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.
Csaba BatóDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor MezőMTA-ELTE Research Group of Peptide Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán BánócziDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1880-4042
Eötvös Loránd University · HU

Funding

National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary 2018-2.1.13-TÉT-FR-2018-00007National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary TKP2020-IKA-05Tempus Public Foundation Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPP) are promising tools for the transport of a broad range of compounds into cells. Since the discovery of the first members of this peptide family, many other peptides have been identified; nowadays, dozens of these peptides are known. These peptides sometimes have very different chemical-physical properties, but they have similar drawbacks; e.g., non-specific internalization, fast elimination from the body, intracellular/vesicular entrapment. Although our knowledge regarding the mechanism and structure-activity relationship of internalization is growing, the prediction and design of the cell-penetrating properties are challenging. In this review, we focus on the different modifications of well-known CPPs to avoid their drawbacks, as well as how these modifications may increase their internalization and/or change the mechanism of penetration.

Indexed as

cell-penetrating peptidechemical modificationdrug deliveryinternalizationpeptide conjugate

Identifiers

PMID35631493
PMCPMC9146218
OpenAlexW4224315491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.