Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631460›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Safety of Short-Term Treatments with Oral Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine in Patients with and without COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Sergio Marin, Alba Martin Val, Maite Bosch Peligero, Cristina Rodríguez-Bernuz, Ariadna Pérez-Ricart, Laia Vilaró Jaques, Roger Paredes, Josep Roca, Carles Quiñones

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sergio MarinPharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7709-6504
Alba Martin ValPharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-3199
Maite Bosch PeligeroPharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
Cristina Rodríguez-BernuzPharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
Ariadna Pérez-RicartPharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
Laia Vilaró JaquesPharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
Roger ParedesIrsiCaixa AIDS Institute, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
Josep RocaEpidemiology Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
Carles QuiñonesPharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESIrsiCaixa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have recently become the focus of global attention as possible treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The current systematic review aims to assess their safety in short treatments (≤14 days), whether used alone or in combination with other drugs. Following the PRISMA and SWiM recommendations, a search was conducted using four health databases for all relevant English-, Chinese-, and Spanish-language studies from inception through 30 July 2021. Patients treated for any condition and with any comparator were included. The outcomes of interest were early drug adverse effects and their frequency. A total of 254 articles met the inclusion criteria, including case and case-control reports as well as cross-sectional, cohort, and randomised studies. The results were summarised either qualitatively in table or narrative form or, when possible (99 studies), quantitatively in terms of adverse event frequencies. Quality evaluation was conducted using the CARE, STROBE, and JADAD tools. This systematic review showed that safety depended on drug indication. In COVID-19 patients, cardiac adverse effects, such as corrected QT interval prolongation, were relatively frequent (0-27.3% and up to 33% if combined with azithromycin), though the risk of torsade de pointes was low. Compared to non-COVID-19 patients, COVID-19 patients experienced a higher frequency of cardiac adverse effects regardless of the regimen used. Dermatological adverse effects affected 0-10% of patients with autoimmune diseases and COVID-19. A broad spectrum of neuropsychiatric adverse effects affected patients treated with CQ for malaria with variable frequencies and some cases were reported in COVID-19 patients. Gastrointestinal adverse effects occurred regardless of drug indication affecting 0-50% of patients. In conclusion, CQ and HCQ are two safe drugs widely used in the treatment of malaria and autoimmune diseases. However, recent findings on their cardiac and neuropsychiatric adverse effects should be considered if these drugs were to be proposed as antivirals again.

Indexed as

adverse reactionschloroquinedrug safetyhydroxychloroquinesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35631460
PMCPMC9144263
OpenAlexW4281254660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.