ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Mono or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Treating Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease after Lower Extremity Revascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07076082 (Vascular Trial Associated Registry Pilot), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Vascular Trial Associated Registry Pilot: Antiplatelet Therapies for Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Endovascular Revascularization
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy after revascularization in diabetes and chronic limb-threatening ischemia: a target trial emulation study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Observational
- Compliance with the Veterans Health Administration's Pharmacy Benefit Management guidance for duration of clopidogrel following peripheral vascular interventions: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Dual versus single antiplatelet therapy after lower extremity revascularization in peripheral artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Systemic outcomes of symptomatic peripheral artery disease patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing lower limb endovascular treatment: a propensity score-matched analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Short-term outcomes of the iCover balloon-expandable covered stent for iliac artery lesions.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- Single versus dual antiplatelet therapy impact on coagulation/thrombosis post PAD revascularization.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after lower-limb intervention remains controversial. Currently, the prescription of DAPT after an intervention is not fully recommended in guidelines due to limited evidence. This study compares and analyzes the prognosis for symptomatic PAD patients receiving DAPT versus monotherapy after lower-limb revascularization. Up to November 2021, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies reporting the efficacy, duration, and bleeding complications when either DAPT or monotherapy were used to treat PAD patients after revascularization. Three randomized controlled trials and seven nonrandomized controlled trials were included in our study. In total, 74,651 patients made up these ten studies. DAPT in PAD patients after intervention was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79−0.94; p < 0.01), major adverse limb events (HR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47−0.78; p < 0.01), and major amputation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64−0.96) when follow-up was for more than 1-year. DAPT was not associated with major bleeding events when compared with monotherapy (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.69−2.18; p = 0.50) but was associated with a higher rate of minor bleeding as a complication (OR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.59−4.08; p < 0.01). More prospective randomized studies are needed to provide further solid evidence regarding the important issue of prescribing DAPT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.