Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631252›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Medicinal Plants and Their Impact on the Gut Microbiome in Mental Health: A Systematic Review.

Eva-Maria Pferschy-Wenzig, Manuela R Pausan, Karin Ardjomand-Woelkart, Stefanie Röck, Ramy M Ammar, Olaf Kelber, Christine Moissl-Eichinger, Rudolf Bauer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Impact ofCurrent neuropharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Impact of curcumin on gut microbiome.World journal of experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eva-Maria Pferschy-WenzigDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Beethovenstraße 8, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-0732
Manuela R PausanPhytomedicines Supply and Development Center, Bayer Consumer Health, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH, Havelstraße 5, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany.
Karin Ardjomand-WoelkartDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Beethovenstraße 8, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Stefanie RöckDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Beethovenstraße 8, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Ramy M AmmarPhytomedicines Supply and Development Center, Bayer Consumer Health, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH, Havelstraße 5, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany.
Olaf KelberPhytomedicines Supply and Development Center, Bayer Consumer Health, Steigerwald Arzneimittelwerk GmbH, Havelstraße 5, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany.
Christine Moissl-EichingerBioTechMed, Mozartgasse 12, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Rudolf BauerDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Graz, Beethovenstraße 8, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0057-5547

Funding

Austrian Research Promotion Agency BW000017276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious neurocognitive and mental health-related conditions have been associated with the gut microbiome, implicating a microbiome-gut-brain axis (MGBA). The aim of this systematic review was to identify, categorize, and review clinical evidence supporting medicinal plants for the treatment of mental disorders and studies on their interactions with the gut microbiota.

methodsThis review included medicinal plants for which clinical studies on depression, sleeping disorders, anxiety, or cognitive dysfunction as well as scientific evidence of interaction with the gut microbiome were available. The studies were reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

resultsEighty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and covered thirty mental health-related medicinal plants with data on interaction with the gut microbiome.

conclusionOnly a few studies have been specifically designed to assess how herbal preparations affect MGBA-related targets or pathways. However, many studies provide hints of a possible interaction with the MGBA, such as an increased abundance of health-beneficial microorganisms, anti-inflammatory effects, or MGBA-related pathway effects by gut microbial metabolites. Data for

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePlants, MedicinalAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansMental Healthanxietycognitive impairmentdepressiongastrointestinalgut bacteriagut microbiomegut microbiotainsomniamedicinal plantmental healthmicrobiome–gut–brain axisphyto-psychobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35631252
PMCPMC9144835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.