Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631201›Full record

ReviewNutrients2022

The Cow's Milk-Related Symptom Score (CoMiSS

Katerina Bajerova, Silvia Salvatore, Christophe Dupont, Philippe Eigenmann, Mikael Kuitunen, Rosan Meyer, Carmen Ribes-Koninckx, Raanan Shamir, Hania Szajewska, Yvan Vandenplas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cow's Milk Protein Allergy.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 10 countries.

Katerina BajerovaDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk's University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Silvia SalvatoreDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Christophe DupontRamsay Group, France et Clinique Marcel Sembat, Paris Descartes University, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4943-6329
Philippe EigenmannPediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Mikael KuitunenChildren's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Rosan MeyerDepartment Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London SW3 6LY, UK.
Carmen Ribes-KoninckxPediatric Gastroenterology, La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Raanan ShamirSchneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Institute of Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Diseases, Petach Tikva 4920235, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4287-3681
Hania SzajewskaDepartment of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
Yvan VandenplasUZ Brussel, KidZ Health Castle, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1862-8651
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESMasaryk University · CZMedical University of Warsaw · PLSchneider Children's Medical Center · ILUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Winchester · GBVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cow’s Milk-related Symptom Score (CoMiSS™) was developed as a clinical tool aimed at increasing the awareness of health care professionals for the presence and intensity of clinical manifestations possibly related to cow’s milk (CM) intake. This review summarizes current evidence on CoMiSS. We found twenty-five original studies, one pooled analysis of three studies, and two reviews on CoMiSS. Infants exhibiting symptoms possibly related to CM, present with a higher median CoMiSS (6 to 13; 16 studies) than apparently healthy infants (median from 3 to 4; and mean 3.6−4.7; 5 studies). In children with cow’s milk allergy (CMA), 11 studies found that a CoMiSS of ≥12 predicted a favorable response to a CM-free diet; however, sensitivity (20% to 77%) and specificity (54% to 92%) varied. The decrease of CoMiSS during a CM elimination diet was also predictive of a reaction to an oral food challenge to diagnose CMA. A low CoMiSS (<6) was predictive for the absence of CMA. It was shown that no special training is required to use the tool in a reliable way. Intra-rater reliability was high with very low variability (intra-class correlation 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.90−0.96; p < 0.001) in repeated assessments. This review found that CoMiSS cannot be considered as a stand-alone CMA diagnostic tool, but that it is a useful awareness tool for CMA as well as for monitoring symptom improvement.

Indexed as

MilkMilk HypersensitivityAllergensAnimalsCattleFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsAllergensCoMiSScow’s milkcow’s milk allergyfood allergyinfant

Identifiers

PMID35631201
PMCPMC9146599
OpenAlexW4280649652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.