Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631124›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Prevalence of

Daniela Almeida, João Quirino, Pedro Matos, Fernando Esteves, Rita Cruz, Helena Vala, João R Mesquita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The global seroprevalence ofThe veterinary quarterly · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Occurrence ofVeterinary world · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela AlmeidaICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0872-4954
João QuirinoICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Pedro MatosDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João EPE, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4208-7939
Fernando EstevesInstituto Politécnico de Viseu, Campus Politécnico, Escola Superior Agrária de Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.
Rita CruzInstituto Politécnico de Viseu, Campus Politécnico, Escola Superior Agrária de Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5767-7835
Helena ValaInstituto Politécnico de Viseu, Campus Politécnico, Escola Superior Agrária de Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6829-4867
João R MesquitaEpidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8769-8103
Universidade do Porto · PTHospital de São João · PTPolytechnic Institute of Viseu · PTUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a worldwide zoonotic disease with different and complex routes for transmission. Workers occupationally exposed to animals or raw meat and viscera (WOE) may be at more risk than the general population, however conflicting data exist on the risk of developing toxoplasmosis due to this close contact. To add knowledge to this topic, the aim of the present study was to ascertain if WOE were more likely to be anti-T. gondii IgG seropositive than the general population as well as to study risk factors for T. gondii infection such as professional activity, gender, age, years of work and region. For this purpose, a case−control study using archived samples was setup. A total of 114 WOE (including pig slaughterhouse workers, butchers, veterinarians and farmers) and 228 anonymous volunteers (matched with cases by region, age and gender) were studied for anti-T. gondii IgG. A significantly higher anti-T. gondii IgG occurrence (p = 0.0282) was found in WOE when compared with the general population (72.8% [CI = 64.6−81.0%] versus 60.1% [CI = 54.6−65.6%]). Multivariate analysis showed that WOE of more than 50 years of age were more likely to be seropositive for anti-T. gondii IgG (aOR = 16.8; 95% CI 3.6−77.5; p < 0.001) than those aged less than 50 years. To our knowledge, this is the first case−control study on the prevalence of anti-T. gondii IgG in WOE in Portugal, also showing an added risk for T. gondii infection in those exposed to animals or their meat and viscera.

Indexed as

antibodiesoccupational exposureone healthToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID35631124
PMCPMC9145616
OpenAlexW4281264434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.