Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35631094›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Performance of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Technique in Milk Samples for the Diagnosis of Bovine Tuberculosis in Dairy Cattle Using a Bayesian Approach.

Tawatchai Singhla, Surachai Pikulkaew, Sukolrat Boonyayatra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An ELISA test using a circulatingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tawatchai SinghlaDepartment of Food Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9112-2561
Surachai PikulkaewDepartment of Food Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9922-7357
Sukolrat BoonyayatraDepartment of Food Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1142-0564
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

Huvepharma (Thailand) R000009894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and single intradermal tuberculin (SIT) tests for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in dairy cattle in Thailand using a Bayesian approach. The SIT test was performed in 203 lactating dairy cattle from nine dairy farms located in Chiang Mai province, Thailand. Milk samples were collected for the LAMP test. Kappa analysis was performed to determine the agreement between the two tests. A one-population conditional independence Bayesian model was applied to estimate the Se and Sp of the two tests. Of 203 dairy cattle, 2 were positive for the SIT test using standard interpretation, whereas 38 were positive for the LAMP test. A poor agreement (kappa = 0) was observed between the two tests. The median Se and Sp of the SIT test using standard interpretation were 63.5% and 99.1%, respectively. The median Se and Sp of the LAMP test were 67.2% and 82.0%, respectively. The estimated true prevalence of bTB was 3.7%. The LAMP test with milk samples can potentially be used as a non-invasive screening test for the diagnosis of bTB in dairy cattle.

Indexed as

Bayesian modelingbovine tuberculosisloop-mediated isothermal amplificationsingle intradermal tuberculin testtest performance

Identifiers

PMID35631094
PMCPMC9144818
OpenAlexW4280490618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.