Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35630725›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Contemporary Developments and Emerging Trends in the Application of Spectroscopy Techniques: A Particular Reference to Coconut (

Ravi Pandiselvam, Rathnakumar Kaavya, Sergio I Martinez Monteagudo, V Divya, Surangna Jain, Anandu Chandra Khanashyam, Anjineyulu Kothakota, V Arun Prasath, S V Ramesh, N U Sruthi and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Ravi PandiselvamPhysiology, Biochemistry and Post-Harvest Technology Division, ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod 671124, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0996-8328
Rathnakumar KaavyaDairy and Food Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Sergio I Martinez MonteagudoDairy and Food Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
V DivyaSchool of BioSciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Surangna JainDepartment of Biotechnology, Mahidol University, Bangkok 12120, Thailand.
Anandu Chandra KhanashyamDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Anjineyulu KothakotaAgro-Processing & Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (NIIST), Trivandrum 695019, Kerala, India.
V Arun PrasathDepartment of Food Process Engineering, NIT, Rourkela 769008, Odisha, India.
S V RameshPhysiology, Biochemistry and Post-Harvest Technology Division, ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod 671124, Kerala, India.
N U SruthiAgricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India.
Manoj KumarChemical and Biochemical Processing Division, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019, Maharashtra, India.
M R ManikantanPhysiology, Biochemistry and Post-Harvest Technology Division, ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod 671124, Kerala, India.
Chinnaraja Ashok KumarDepartment of Food Safety and Quality Assurance, College of Food and Dairy Technology, Chennai 600051, Tamil Nadu, India.
Amin Mousavi KhaneghahDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-875, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5769-0004
Daniel CozzolinoCentre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6247-8817
Central Plantation Crops Research Institute · INICAR - Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology · INIndian Institute of Technology Kharagpur · INKasetsart University · THMahidol University · THNational Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology · INNational Institute of Technology Rourkela · INNew Mexico State University · USSouth Dakota State University · USTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INThe University of Queensland · AUUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of food frauds in coconut-based products is increasing due to higher consumer demands for these products. Rising health consciousness, public awareness and increased concerns about food safety and quality have made authorities and various other certifying agencies focus more on the authentication of coconut products. As the conventional techniques for determining the quality attributes of coconut are destructive and time-consuming, non-destructive testing methods which are accurate, rapid, and easy to perform with no detrimental sampling methods are currently gaining importance. Spectroscopic methods such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), infrared (IR)spectroscopy, mid-infrared (MIR)spectroscopy, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS) spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Raman spectroscopy (RS) are gaining in importance for determining the oxidative stability of coconut oil, the adulteration of oils, and the detection of harmful additives, pathogens, and toxins in coconut products and are also employed in deducing the interactions in food constituents, and microbial contaminations. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive analysis on the various spectroscopic techniques along with different chemometric approaches for the successful authentication and quality determination of coconut products. The manuscript was prepared by analyzing and compiling the articles that were collected from various databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and ScienceDirect. The spectroscopic techniques in combination with chemometrics were shown to be successful in the authentication of coconut products. RS and NMR spectroscopy techniques proved their utility and accuracy in assessing the changes in coconut oil's chemical and viscosity profile. FTIR spectroscopy was successfully utilized to analyze the oxidation levels and determine the authenticity of coconut oils. An FT-NIR-based analysis of various coconut samples confirmed the acceptable levels of accuracy in prediction. These non-destructive methods of spectroscopy offer a broad spectrum of applications in food processing industries to detect adulterants. Moreover, the combined chemometrics and spectroscopy detection method is a versatile and accurate measurement for adulterant identification.

Indexed as

CocosSpectrum Analysis, RamanCoconut OilPlant OilsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredCoconut OilPlant OilscoconutFT-NIR-based techniqueoxidationperoxide valuetender coconut watervirgin coconut oil

Identifiers

PMID35630725
PMCPMC9147692
OpenAlexW4280616691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.