Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35630499›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2022

María Antonia Cruz-Hernández, Alberto Mendoza-Herrera, Virgilio Bocanegra-García, Gildardo Rivera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Study of the Different Strains of the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Amine-recognizing domain in diverse receptors from bacteria and archaea evolved from the universal amino acid sensor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Inoculation withPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Studies Using Mutant Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

María Antonia Cruz-HernándezLaboratorio Interacción Ambiente Microorganismo, Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Reynosa 88710, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8680-6467
Alberto Mendoza-HerreraLaboratorio Interacción Ambiente Microorganismo, Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Reynosa 88710, Mexico.
Virgilio Bocanegra-GarcíaLaboratorio Interacción Ambiente Microorganismo, Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Reynosa 88710, Mexico.
Gildardo RiveraLaboratorio de Biotecnología Farmacéutica, Centro de Biotecnología Genómica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Reynosa 88710, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9842-4167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenobiotic contamination, a worldwide environmental concern, poses risks for humans, animals, microbe health, and agriculture. Hydrocarbons and heavy metals top the list of toxins that represent a risk to nature. This review deals with the study of

Indexed as

Azospirillumbioremediationxenobiotic

Identifiers

PMID35630499
PMCPMC9143718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.