Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35630396›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Oral Bacteria and Their Antibiotic Susceptibilities in Taiwanese Venomous Snakes.

Po-Chun Chuang, Wen-Hao Lin, Yi-Chun Chen, Chun-Chih Chien, I-Min Chiu, Tein-Shun Tsai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Case ofClinical case reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Advancing the study of microbial symbionts of amphibians and reptiles.Frontiers in amphibian and reptile science · 2026
    Article
  4. Oral microflora ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Chinese guideline for management of snakebites.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Po-Chun ChuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan.
Wen-Hao LinInstitute of Wildlife Conservation, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912301, Taiwan.
Yi-Chun ChenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan.
Chun-Chih ChienCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan.
I-Min ChiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan.
Tein-Shun TsaiDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912301, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7245-1826
Chang Gung University · TWNational Pingtung University of Science and Technology · TWKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

CHANG GUNG MEDICAL FOUNDATION CMRPG8K0951FORESTRY BUREAU, COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURE 1106240512KAOHSIUNG CITY GOVERNMENT 11031183800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound infections after venomous snakebites are clinically important. Information regarding the nature and antibiotic susceptibilities of snake oral bacterial flora could support empiric antibiotic therapy. Wild venomous snakes were collected from southern Taiwan: a total of 30 each of Bungarus multicinctus, Naja atra, Protobothrops mucrosquamatus, and Trimeresurus stejnegeri; 3 Deinagkistrodon acutus; and 4 Daboia siamensis. The species and antibiotic susceptibilities of their oral bacteria were determined. Aerobic gram-negative bacteria, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus vulgaris, were the most abundant. Proteus vulgaris were more abundant in B. multicinctus, N. atra, and P. mucrosquamatus than in T. stejnegeri (40%, 43.3%, and 40% vs. 13.3%, respectively). The gram-negative species were less susceptible to first- and second-generation cephalosporins and ampicillin-sulbactam than to third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, or piperacillin-tazobactam. The most abundant aerobic gram-positive species cultured was Enterococcus faecalis, which was more abundant in N. atra than in other snakes (p < 0.001) and was highly susceptible to ampicillin, high-level gentamicin, penicillin, teicoplanin, and vancomycin. Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium species were the most common anaerobic bacteria. The anaerobic organisms were highly susceptible to metronidazole and piperacillin. As a reference for empiric antimicrobial therapy, third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, or piperacillin-tazobactam can be initiated in venomous snakebites wound infections.

Indexed as

antibiotic susceptibilityelapidsneglected diseasespit viperssnakebiteswound infection

Identifiers

PMID35630396
PMCPMC9147925
OpenAlexW4229065846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.