Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35630380›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Effects of

Nikolett Palkovicsné Pézsa, Dóra Kovács, Bence Rácz, Orsolya Farkas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MitigatingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Antioxidant Activity ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of Luteolin in an In Vitro Model of Porcine Intestinal Infections.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The P4' Peptide-CarryingAquaculture nutrition · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolett Palkovicsné PézsaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9955-289X
Dóra KovácsDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1785-3248
Bence RáczDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1933-5332
Orsolya FarkasDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.
University of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance raises serious concerns worldwide. Probiotics offer a promising alternative to enhance growth promotion in farm animals; however, their mode of action still needs to be elucidated. The IPEC-J2 cell line (porcine intestinal epithelial cells) is an appropriate tool to study the effect of probiotics on intestinal epithelial cells. In our experiments, IPEC-J2 cells were challenged by two gastrointestinal (GI) infection causing agents,

Indexed as

adhesionantibiotic alternativeBacillus licheniformisBacillus subtilisbarrier functionEscherichia coliIPEC-J2proinflammatory cytokinesROSSalmonella Typhimurium

Identifiers

PMID35630380
PMCPMC9145911
OpenAlexW4225146407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.