ArticleMicroorganisms2022
Diversity Patterns of Protists Are Highly Affected by Methods Disentangling Biological Variants: A Case Study in Oligotrich (s.l.) Ciliates.
Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protists are a dominant group in marine microplankton communities and play important roles in energy flux and nutrient cycling in marine ecosystems. Environmental sequences produced by high-throughput sequencing (HTS) methods are increasingly used for inferring the diversity and distribution patterns of protists. However, studies testing whether methods disentangling biological variants affect the diversity and distribution patterns of protists using field samples are insufficient. Oligotrich (s.l.) ciliates are one group of the abundant and dominant planktonic protists in coastal waters and open oceans. Using oligotrich (s.l.) ciliates in field samples as an example, the present study indicates that DADA2 performs better than SWARM, UNOISE, UPARSE, and UCLUST for inferring diversity patterns of oligotrich (s.l.) ciliates in the Pearl River Estuary and surrounding regions. UPARSE and UNOISE might underestimate species richness. SWARM might not be suitable for the resolution of alpha diversity owing to its rigorous clustering and sensitivity to sequence variations. UCLUST with 99% clustering threshold overestimates species richness, and the beta diversity pattern inferred by DADA2 is more reasonable than that of the other methods. Additionally, salinity is shown to be one of the key factors responsible for variations in the community distribution of ciliates, but infrequent marine-freshwater transitions occurred during evolutionary terms of this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.