Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35630247›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2022

From Soft to Hard Biomimetic Materials: Tuning Micro/Nano-Architecture of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration.

Felicia Carotenuto, Sara Politi, Arsalan Ul Haq, Fabio De Matteis, Emanuela Tamburri, Maria Letizia Terranova, Laura Teodori, Alessandra Pasquo, Paolo Di Nardo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felicia CarotenutoDipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0142-6690
Sara PolitiDepartment of Fusion and Technologies for Nuclear Safety and Security, Diagnostic and Metrology (FSN-TECFIS-DIM), ENEA, CR Frascati, 00044 Rome, Italy.
Arsalan Ul HaqDipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8013-1462
Fabio De MatteisCentro di Ricerca Interdipartimentale di Medicina Rigenerativa (CIMER), Università Degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Emanuela TamburriCentro di Ricerca Interdipartimentale di Medicina Rigenerativa (CIMER), Università Degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Maria Letizia TerranovaCentro di Ricerca Interdipartimentale di Medicina Rigenerativa (CIMER), Università Degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Laura TeodoriDepartment of Fusion and Technologies for Nuclear Safety and Security, Diagnostic and Metrology (FSN-TECFIS-DIM), ENEA, CR Frascati, 00044 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra PasquoDepartment of Fusion and Technologies for Nuclear Safety and Security, Diagnostic and Metrology (FSN-TECFIS-DIM), ENEA, CR Frascati, 00044 Rome, Italy.
Paolo Di NardoDipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Medicina Traslazionale, Università Degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Failure of tissues and organs resulting from degenerative diseases or trauma has caused huge economic and health concerns around the world. Tissue engineering represents the only possibility to revert this scenario owing to its potential to regenerate or replace damaged tissues and organs. In a regeneration strategy, biomaterials play a key role promoting new tissue formation by providing adequate space for cell accommodation and appropriate biochemical and biophysical cues to support cell proliferation and differentiation. Among other physical cues, the architectural features of the biomaterial as a kind of instructive stimuli can influence cellular behaviors and guide cells towards a specific tissue organization. Thus, the optimization of biomaterial micro/nano architecture, through different manufacturing techniques, is a crucial strategy for a successful regenerative therapy. Over the last decades, many micro/nanostructured biomaterials have been developed to mimic the defined structure of ECM of various soft and hard tissues. This review intends to provide an overview of the relevant studies on micro/nanostructured scaffolds created for soft and hard tissue regeneration and highlights their biological effects, with a particular focus on striated muscle, cartilage, and bone tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

architectural featuresbone regenerationcardiac muscular regenerationcartilage regenerationmicro/nanostructured biomaterialsscaffolding strategiestissue engineeringtissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID35630247
PMCPMC9144100
OpenAlexW4280647292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.