Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35630110›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2022

Schistoscope: An Automated Microscope with Artificial Intelligence for Detection of

Prosper Oyibo, Satyajith Jujjavarapu, Brice Meulah, Tope Agbana, Ingeborg Braakman, Angela van Diepen, Michel Bengtson, Lisette van Lieshout, Wellington Oyibo, Gleb Vdovine and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diagnosis of Human Trematode Infections.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Artificial Intelligence in Point-of-Care Testing.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Prosper OyiboDelft Center for Systems and Control, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4316-0883
Satyajith JujjavarapuDepartment of Sustainable Design Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands.
Brice MeulahDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tope AgbanaDelft Center for Systems and Control, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Ingeborg BraakmanDepartment of Sustainable Design Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands.
Angela van DiepenDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michel BengtsonDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lisette van LieshoutDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wellington OyiboANDI Centre of Excellence for Malaria Diagnosis, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos 101017, Nigeria.
Gleb VdovineDelft Center for Systems and Control, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Jan-Carel DiehlDepartment of Sustainable Design Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4007-2282
Delft University of Technology · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Lagos · NG

Funding

Dutch Research Council W 07.30318.009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many parasitic diseases, the microscopic examination of clinical samples such as urine and stool still serves as the diagnostic reference standard, primarily because microscopes are accessible and cost-effective. However, conventional microscopy is laborious, requires highly skilled personnel, and is highly subjective. Requirements for skilled operators, coupled with the cost and maintenance needs of the microscopes, which is hardly done in endemic countries, presents grossly limited access to the diagnosis of parasitic diseases in resource-limited settings. The urgent requirement for the management of tropical diseases such as schistosomiasis, which is now focused on elimination, has underscored the critical need for the creation of access to easy-to-use diagnosis for case detection, community mapping, and surveillance. In this paper, we present a low-cost automated digital microscope-the Schistoscope-which is capable of automatic focusing and scanning regions of interest in prepared microscope slides, and automatic detection of

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautofocusdiagnosisdigital microscopedistributed manufacturinglow resources settingsparasitesSchistosomaslide scanner

Identifiers

PMID35630110
PMCPMC9146062
OpenAlexW4224302708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.