Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629945›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2022

Effects of Different Prenatal Nutrition Strategies on the Liver Metabolome of Bulls and Its Correlation with Body and Liver Weight.

Guilherme Henrique Gebim Polizel, Fernando Augusto Correia Queiroz Cançado, Evandro Fernando Ferreira Dias, Arícia Christofaro Fernandes, Roberta Cavalcante Cracco, Brenda Tonsic Carmona, Henrique Hespanhol Castellar, Mirele Daiana Poleti, Miguel Henrique de Almeida Santana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guilherme Henrique Gebim PolizelDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8497-9898
Fernando Augusto Correia Queiroz CançadoDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Evandro Fernando Ferreira DiasDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Arícia Christofaro FernandesDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Roberta Cavalcante CraccoDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Brenda Tonsic CarmonaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Henrique Hespanhol CastellarDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Mirele Daiana PoletiDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Miguel Henrique de Almeida SantanaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering-USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9144-7697

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 00000National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 307593/2021-5São Paulo Research Foundation 17/12105-2São Paulo Research Foundation 21/03265-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of prenatal nutrition on liver metabolome and on body (BW) and liver weight (LW) of Nellore bulls at slaughter. Three treatments were applied in 126 cows during pregnancy: NP—control (mineral supplementation); PP—protein-energy supplementation in the third trimester; and FP—protein-energy supplementation during the entire pregnancy. Offspring BW and LW were evaluated, and a targeted metabolomics analysis was performed on their livers (n = 18, 22.5 ± 1 months of age). Data were submitted to principal component analysis (PCA), analysis of variance (ANOVA), enrichment analysis, and Pearson’s correlation analysis. The phenotypes did not show differences between treatments (p > 0.05). Metabolites PCA showed an overlap of treatment clusters in the analysis. We found significant metabolites in ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05; Glycine, Hydroxytetradecadienylcarnitine, Aminoadipic acid and Carnosine). Enrichment analysis revealed some biological processes (Histidine metabolism, beta-Alanine metabolism, and Lysine degradation). Pearson’s correlation analysis showed 29 significant correlated metabolites with BW and 1 metabolite correlated with LW. In summary, prenatal nutrition did not show effects on the phenotypes evaluated, but affected some metabolites and biological pathways, mainly related to oxidative metabolism. In addition, BW seems to influence the hepatic metabolome more than LW, due to the amount and magnitude of correlations found.

Indexed as

beef cattlefetal programminghepatic metabolitesmaternal nutrition

Identifiers

PMID35629945
PMCPMC9143101
OpenAlexW4280544031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.