Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629917›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2022

Effects of a Polyherbal Dietary Additive on Performance, Dietary Energetics, Carcass Traits, and Blood Metabolites of Finishing Lambs.

Griselda Dorantes-Iturbide, José Felipe Orzuna-Orzuna, Alejandro Lara-Bueno, Luis Alberto Miranda-Romero, Germán David Mendoza-Martínez, Pedro Abel Hernández-García

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Effect of Supplementing Milk Replacer withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Effect of Water Extract ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Griselda Dorantes-IturbidePosgrado en Producción Animal, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Texcoco CP 56230, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8055-7973
José Felipe Orzuna-OrzunaPosgrado en Producción Animal, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Texcoco CP 56230, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2496-4712
Alejandro Lara-BuenoPosgrado en Producción Animal, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Texcoco CP 56230, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8538-1321
Luis Alberto Miranda-RomeroPosgrado en Producción Animal, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Texcoco CP 56230, Mexico.
Germán David Mendoza-MartínezDepartamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal, Unidad Xochimilco, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City CP 04960, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8613-6464
Pedro Abel Hernández-GarcíaCentro Universitario UAEM Amecameca, Universidad Autónoma del Estado De México, Amecameca CP 56900, Mexico.
Chapingo Autonomous University · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de México · MXUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation of a polyherbal additive (PA) containing hydrolyzable tannins, flavonoids, and essential oils on productive performance, dietary energetics, carcass and meat characteristics, and blood metabolites of lambs in their finishing phase. Twenty-eight Pelibuey × Katahdin lambs (20.52 ± 0.88 kg body weight (BW)) were housed in individual pens and assigned to four treatments (n = 7) with different doses of PA: 0 (CON), 1 (PA1), 2 (PA2), and 3 (PA3) g of PA kg−1 of DM for 56 days. Compared to the CON, lambs in PA1 treatment had higher average daily gain (p = 0.03), higher dietary energy utilization (p = 0.01), greater backfat thickness (p = 0.02), greater Longissimus dorsi muscle area (p = 0.01), and better feed conversion ratio (p = 0.02). PA supplementation did not affect (p > 0.05) dry matter intake, carcass yield, biometric measures, and meat chemical composition. All hematological and most of the blood biochemical parameters were similar in lambs of all treatments (p > 0.05). However, compared to the CON, lambs assigned to the PA3 treatment had lower serum urea concentration (p = 0.05) and higher serum albumin concentration (p = 0.03). In conclusion, low doses of PA could be used as a growth promoter in finishing lambs without affecting dry matter intake, carcass yield, meat chemical composition, and health status of the lambs. However, more in vivo research is needed to better understand the impact of bioactive compounds from PA used on productivity, metabolism, and health status of finishing lambs.

Indexed as

bioactive compoundsgrowth promotershematological profilemeat composition

Identifiers

PMID35629917
PMCPMC9143098
OpenAlexW4225422854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.