ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Bone Growth Characteristics in Additive-Manufactured Porous Titanium, Nonporous Titanium, and Porous Tantalum Interbody Cages.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Stand-alone porous titanium cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical outcomes in a multicenter experience.Neurosurgical review · 2026Observational
- Preclinical evaluation of a 3D-printed porous stand-alone interbody cage for cervical fusion in a sheep model.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Metal Composite Bone Grafts in Preclinical Spinal Fusion Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Natural potential difference induced functional optimization mechanism for Zn-based multimetal bone implants.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Biomechanical analysis of a newly designed and 3D printed plate-locking interbody cage: an observational study of finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- 3D-printed artificial bone scaffolds: the design of materials, the incorporation of bioactive substances, and the integration of vascularized tissue flaps.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Review
- Design of Ti64/Ta Hybrid Materials by Powder Metallurgy Mimicking Bone Structure.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Prediction and Numerical Study of Thermal Performance of Gradient Porous Structures Based on Voronoi Tessellation Design.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Definition, measurement, and function of pore structure dimensions of bioengineered porous bone tissue materials based on additive manufacturing: A review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Autogenous bone grafts are the gold standard for interbody fusion implant materials; however, they have several disadvantages. Tantalum (Ta) and titanium (Ti) are ideal materials for interbody cages because of their biocompatibility, particularly when they are incorporated into a three-dimensional (3D) porous structure. We conducted an in vitro investigation of the cell attachment and osteogenic markers of self-fabricated uniform porous Ti (20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%), nonporous Ti, and porous Ta cages (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.