Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629676›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Metallic Implants Used in Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Jakub Litak, Michał Szymoniuk, Wojciech Czyżewski, Zofia Hoffman, Joanna Litak, Leon Sakwa, Piotr Kamieniak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. An Update on Implant-Associated Malignancies and Their Biocompatibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A novel rodent model of chronic spinal implant-associated infection.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Silk Fibroin/ZnO Coated TiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jakub LitakDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 4A, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-9263
Michał SzymoniukStudent Scientific Society, Medical University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 1, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.
Wojciech CzyżewskiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery in Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6949-2769
Zofia HoffmanStudent Scientific Society, Medical University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 1, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7996-0706
Joanna LitakSt. John's Cancer Center, Jaczewskiego 7, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Leon SakwaStudent Scientific Society, Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technologies and Humanities in Radom, Chrobrego 27, 26-600 Radom, Poland.
Piotr KamieniakDepartment of Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery in Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PLKazimierz Pułaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, pedicle fixation systems have evolved and modifications in spinal fusion techniques have been developed to increase fusion rates and improve clinical outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Regarding materials used for screw and rod manufacturing, metals, especially titanium alloys, are the most popular resources. In the case of pedicle screws, that biomaterial can be also doped with hydroxyapatite, CaP, ECM, or tantalum. Other materials used for rod fabrication include cobalt-chromium alloys and nitinol (nickel-titanium alloy). In terms of mechanical properties, the ideal implant used in LIF should have high tensile and fatigue strength, Young's modulus similar to that of the bone, and should be 100% resistant to corrosion to avoid mechanical failures. On the other hand, a comprehensive understanding of cellular and molecular pathways is essential to identify preferable characteristics of implanted biomaterial to obtain fusion and avoid implant loosening. Implanted material elicits a biological response driven by immune cells at the site of insertion. These reactions are subdivided into innate (primary cellular response with no previous exposure) and adaptive (a specific type of reaction induced after earlier exposure to the antigen) and are responsible for wound healing, fusion, and also adverse reactions, i.e., hypersensitivity. The main purposes of this literature review are to summarize the physical and mechanical properties of metal alloys used for spinal instrumentation in LIF which include fatigue strength, Young's modulus, and corrosion resistance. Moreover, we also focused on describing biological response after their implantation into the human body. Our review paper is mainly focused on titanium, cobalt-chromium, nickel-titanium (nitinol), and stainless steel alloys.

Indexed as

cobalt-chromiumimplantsinter body fusionmetal alloysnitinolstainless steeltitanium

Identifiers

PMID35629676
PMCPMC9146470
OpenAlexW4280548094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.