Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629656›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Efficacy of Surgical/Wound Washes against Bacteria: Effect of Different In Vitro Models.

Farhana Parvin, Karen Vickery, Anand K Deva, Honghua Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. AnAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Farhana ParvinFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Karen VickeryFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0998-1370
Anand K DevaFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.
Honghua HuFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3749-4089
Macquarie University · AU

Funding

Macquarie University 20200011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical antiseptics are often used to treat chronic wounds with biofilm infections and during salvage of biofilm contaminated implants, but their antibacterial efficacy is frequently only tested against non-aggregated planktonic or free-swimming organisms. This study evaluated the antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of four commercial surgical washes Bactisure, TorrenTX, minimally invasive lavage (MIS), and Betadine against six bacterial species:

Indexed as

antisepticsbiofilminfectionin vitro modelssurgical washeswound washes

Identifiers

PMID35629656
PMCPMC9145943
OpenAlexW4280544390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.