Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629470›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Artificial Neural Network with a Cross-Validation Technique to Predict the Material Design of Eco-Friendly Engineered Geopolymer Composites.

Yaswanth Kuppusamy, Revathy Jayaseelan, Gajalakshmi Pandulu, Veerappan Sathish Kumar, Gunasekaran Murali, Saurav Dixit, Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yaswanth KuppusamyDepartment of Civil Engineering, B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology, Chennai 600048, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5587-6024
Revathy JayaseelanDepartment of Civil Engineering, B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology, Chennai 600048, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9268-7465
Gajalakshmi PanduluDepartment of Civil Engineering, B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology, Chennai 600048, Tamil Nadu, India.
Veerappan Sathish KumarFaculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-0829-6291
Gunasekaran MuraliPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Saurav DixitPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Nikolai Ivanovich VatinPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-8004

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under the strategic academic leadership program 'Priority 2030' Agreement 075-15-2021-1333 dated 30 September 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A material-tailored special concrete composite that uses a synthetic fiber to make the concrete ductile and imposes strain-hardening characteristics with eco-friendly ingredients is known as an "engineered geopolymer composite (EGC)". Mix design of special concrete is always tedious, particularly without standards. Researchers used several artificial intelligence tools to analyze and design the special concrete. This paper attempts to design the material EGC through an artificial neural network with a cross-validation technique to achieve the desired compressive and tensile strength. A database was formulated with seven mix-design influencing factors collected from the literature. The five best artificial neural network (ANN) models were trained and analyzed. A gradient descent momentum and adaptive learning rate backpropagation (GDX)-based ANN was developed to cross-validate those five best models. Upon regression analysis, ANN [2:16:16:7] model performed best, with 74% accuracy, whereas ANN [2:16:25:7] performed best in cross-validation, with 80% accuracy. The best individual outputs were "tacked-together" from the best five ANN models and were also analyzed, achieving accuracy up to 88%. It is suggested that when these seven mix-design influencing factors are involved, then ANN [2:16:25:7] can be used to predict the mix which can be cross-verified with GDX-ANN [7:14:2] to ensure accuracy and, due to the few mix trials required, help design the SHGC with lower costs, less time, and fewer materials.

Indexed as

artificial neural networkscross validationengineered geopolymer compositesmix design

Identifiers

PMID35629470
PMCPMC9146445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.