Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629313›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Use of Image-Guided Surgical Navigation during Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

Harald C Groen, Anne G den Hartog, Wouter J Heerink, Koert F D Kuhlmann, Niels F M Kok, Ruben van Veen, Marijn A J Hiep, Petur Snaebjornsson, Brechtje A Grotenhuis, Geerard L Beets and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The impact of 3-dimensional models and surgical navigation for open liver surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Feasibility of tracked ultrasound registration for pelvic-abdominal tumor navigation: a patient study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harald C GroenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3587-566X
Anne G den HartogDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter J HeerinkDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Koert F D KuhlmannDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels F M KokDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruben van VeenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marijn A J HiepDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petur SnaebjornssonDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brechtje A GrotenhuisDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geerard L BeetsDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1671-9912
Arend G J AalbersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Theo J M RuersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

Vriendenloterij NKI2016-8162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) presents several challenges, which is why the percentage of inadequate resections of these tumors is high. In this exploratory study, we evaluate the use of image-guided surgical navigation during resection of LRRC. Patients who were scheduled to undergo surgical resection of LRRC who were deemed by the multidisciplinary team to be at a high risk of inadequate tumor resection were selected to undergo surgical navigation. The risk of inadequate surgery was further determined by the proximity of the tumor to critical anatomical structures. Workflow characteristics of the surgical navigation procedure were evaluated, while the surgical outcome was determined by the status of the resection margin. In total, 20 patients were analyzed. For all procedures, surgical navigation was completed successfully and demonstrated to be accurate, while no complications related to the surgical navigation were discerned. Radical resection was achieved in 14 cases (70%). In five cases (25%), a tumor-positive resection margin (R1) was anticipated during surgery, as extensive radical resection was determined to be compromised. These patients all received intraoperative brachytherapy. In one case (5%), an unexpected R1 resection was performed. Surgical navigation during resection of LRRC is thus safe and feasible and enables accurate surgical guidance.

Indexed as

image-guided surgical navigationlocally recurrent rectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID35629313
PMCPMC9143650
OpenAlexW4224996009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.