Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629248›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Association between Statin Use and Risk of Parkinson's Disease: Evidence from 18 Observational Studies Comprising 3.7 Million Individuals.

Chieh-Chen Wu, Md Mohaimenul Islam, An-Jen Lee, Chun-Hsien Su, Yung-Ching Weng, Chih-Yang Yeh, Hsun-Hua Lee, Ming-Chin Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. When bad turns good: a systematic review on cholesterol and LDL in longitudinal patient cohorts with Parkinson's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Update: Protective and risk factors for Parkinson disease.Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chieh-Chen WuDepartment of Healthcare Information and Management, School of Health Technology, Ming Chuan University, Taipei 333, Taiwan.
Md Mohaimenul IslamAESOP Technology, Taipei 105, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6026-2748
An-Jen LeeDepartment of Healthcare Information and Management, School of Health Technology, Ming Chuan University, Taipei 333, Taiwan.
Chun-Hsien SuDepartment of Exercise and Health Promotion, College of Kinesiology and Health, Chinese Culture University, Taipei 111369, Taiwan.
Yung-Ching WengDepartment of Healthcare Information and Management, School of Health Technology, Ming Chuan University, Taipei 333, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7812-6856
Chih-Yang YehGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106339, Taiwan.
Hsun-Hua LeeDepartment of Neurology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1473-4799
Ming-Chin LinGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106339, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9624-9705
Ming Chuan University · TWChinese Culture University · TWTaipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential impact of statins on the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD) is still controversial; therefore, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of observational studies to examine the effect of statin use on the risk of PD. We searched electronic databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science, for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 15 March 2022. Cohort studies which examined the association between statins and PD risk in the general population were also included. Two authors assessed the data and extracted all potential information for analysis. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to measure the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eighteen cohort studies including 3.7 million individuals with 31,153 PD participants were identified. In statin users, compared with non-users, the RR for PD was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.91). In a subgroup analysis of PD, this association was observed with medium and high quality, and the studies were adjusted for age, gender, and smoking status. When the data were stratified according to the duration of exposure, long-duration statin use was associated with a decreased risk of PD (RR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.92). There was no significant decrease in the risk of PD in short-term statin users (RR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.67-1.31). Moreover, no significant difference in the reduction in the risk of PD was observed between men (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75-0.86) and women (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75-0.86). Although our findings confirm a reduction in the PD risk associated with statin treatment and suggest that statins play a clinically favorable role, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Future randomized control trials with an ad hoc design are needed to confirm the potential utility of statins in reducing the risk of PD.

Indexed as

meta-analysisobservational studiesParkinson’s diseasestatins

Identifiers

PMID35629248
PMCPMC9145914
OpenAlexW4280595058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.