ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Diffusion of a Lifelog-Based Digital Healthcare Platform for Future Precision Medicine: Data Provision and Verification Study.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Machine Learning Approach to Classify Human Activity Level Based on Lifelog Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of an AI-Based Predictive Algorithm for Early Diagnosis of High-Risk Dementia Groups among the Elderly: Utilizing Health Lifelog Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose a method for data provision, validation, and service expansion for the spread of a lifelog-based digital healthcare platform. The platform is an operational cloud-based platform, implemented in 2020, that has launched a tool that can validate and de-identify personal information in a data acquisition system dedicated to a center. The data acquired by the platform can be processed into products of statistical analysis and artificial intelligence (AI)-based deep learning modules. Application programming interfaces (APIs) have been developed to open data and can be linked in a programmatic manner. As a standardized policy, a series of procedures were performed from data collection to external sharing. The proposed platform collected 321.42 GB of data for 146 types of data. The reliability and consistency of the data were evaluated by an information system audit institution, with a defects ratio of approximately 0.03%. We presented definitions and examples of APIs developed in 17 functional units for data opening. In addition, the suitability of the de-identification tool was confirmed by evaluating the reduced risk of re-identification using quasi-identifiers. We presented specific methods for data verification, personal information de-identification, and service provision to ensure the sustainability of future digital healthcare platforms for precision medicine. The platform can contribute to the diffusion of the platform by linking data with external organizations and research environments in safe zones based on data reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.