Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629205›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Neural Networks Modeling for Prediction of Required Resources for Personalized Endourologic Treatment of Urolithiasis.

Clemens Huettenbrink, Wolfgang Hitzl, Sascha Pahernik, Jens Kubitz, Valentin Popeneciu, Jascha Ell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clemens HuettenbrinkDepartment of Urology, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.
Wolfgang HitzlResearch and Innovation Management (RIM), Team Biostatistics and Publication of Clinical Trial Studies, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7696-1479
Sascha PahernikDepartment of Urology, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.
Jens KubitzDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.
Valentin PopeneciuDepartment of Urology, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.
Jascha EllDepartment of Urology, Nuremberg General Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When scheduling surgeries for urolithiasis, the lack of information about the complexity of procedures and required instruments can lead to mismanagement, cancellations of elective surgeries and financial risk for the hospital. The aim of this study was to develop, train, and test prediction models for ureterorenoscopy. Routinely acquired Computer Tomography (CT) imaging data and patient data were used as data sources. Machine learning models were trained and tested to predict the need for laser lithotripsy and to forecast the expected duration of ureterorenoscopy on the bases of 474 patients over a period from May 2016 to December 2019. Negative predictive value for use of laser lithotripsy was 92%, and positive predictive value 91% before application of the reject option, increasing to 97% and 94% after application of the reject option. Similar results were found for duration of surgery at ≤30 min. This combined prediction is possible for 54% of patients. Factors influencing prediction of laser application and duration ≤30 min are age, sex, height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), stone size, stone volume, stone density, and presence of a ureteral stent. Neuronal networks for prediction help to identify patients with an operative time ≤30 min who did not require laser lithotripsy. Thus, surgical planning and resource allocation can be optimised to increase efficiency in the Operating Room (OR).

Indexed as

laser lithotripsyneural networkpersonalizedplanningureterorenoscopyurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID35629205
PMCPMC9143218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.