Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629203›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Misjudgment of Skills in Clinical Examination Increases in Medical Students Due to a Shift to Exclusively Online Studies during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Axel Lechner, Stefan P Haider, Benedikt Paul, Pablo F F Escrihuela Branz, Axelle Felicio-Briegel, Magdalena Widmann, Johanna Huber, Ursula Stadlberger, Martin Canis, Florian Schrötzlmair and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Axel LechnerDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Stefan P HaiderDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Benedikt PaulDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Pablo F F Escrihuela BranzDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Axelle Felicio-BriegelDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Magdalena WidmannDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Johanna HuberInstitute for Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstrasse 8a, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Ursula StadlbergerInstitute for Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstrasse 8a, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Martin CanisDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Florian SchrötzlmairDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Kariem SharafDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7799-4005
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical school, practical capacity building is a central goal. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shift to online teaching methods in university was mandated in many countries to reduce risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. This severely affected the teaching of psychomotor ability skills such as head and neck examination skills, resulting in a share of students that have only been taught such ENT-specific examination skills with online courses; our study aimed to measure performance and capacity of self-evaluation in these students. After completing a new extensive online Ear Nose Throat (ENT) examination course, we conducted a standardized clinical skills exam for nine different ENT examination items with 31 students. Using Likert scales, self-evaluation was based on questionnaires right before the clinical skills exam and objective evaluation during the exam was assessed following a standardized regime. Self-evaluation and objective evaluation were correlated. To compare the exclusive online teaching to traditional hands-on training, a historic cohort with 91 students was used. Objective examination performance after in-classroom or online teaching varied for single examination items while overall assessment remained comparable. Overall, self-evaluation did not differ significantly after online-only and in-classroom ENT skill teaching. Nevertheless, misjudgment of one's skill level increased after online-only training compared to in-classroom teaching. Highest levels of overestimation were observed after online training in simple tasks. While gender and interest in ENT did not influence self-evaluation and misjudgment, higher age of participants was associated with an overestimation of skills. Medical students with online-only training during the COVID-19 pandemic achieved similar ENT examination skills to those with traditional on-campus training before the pandemic. Nevertheless, students with online-only training were more prone to misjudge their skills when they assessed their skills. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, current medical students and graduates might therefore lack individual specific psychomotor skills such as the ENT examination, underlining the importance of presence-based teaching.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicmedical educationotorhinolaryngologypsychomotor abilityteaching of skills

Identifiers

PMID35629203
PMCPMC9147864
OpenAlexW4280556880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.