Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629184›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Personalized Model to Predict Small for Gestational Age at Delivery Using Fetal Biometrics, Maternal Characteristics, and Pregnancy Biomarkers: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Births Assisted at a Spanish Hospital.

Peña Dieste-Pérez, Ricardo Savirón-Cornudella, Mauricio Tajada-Duaso, Faustino R Pérez-López, Sergio Castán-Mateo, Gerardo Sanz, Luis Mariano Esteban

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peña Dieste-PérezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miguel Servet University Hospital and Aragón Health Research Institute, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0488-1832
Ricardo Savirón-CornudellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Carlos Clinical Hospital and San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9585-0187
Mauricio Tajada-DuasoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miguel Servet University Hospital and Aragón Health Research Institute, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Faustino R Pérez-LópezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Zaragoza Faculty of Medicine and Aragón Health Research Institute, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Sergio Castán-MateoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miguel Servet University Hospital and Aragón Health Research Institute, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Gerardo SanzDepartment of Statistical Methods and Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems-BIFI, University of Zaragoza,50018 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6474-2252
Luis Mariano EstebanEngineering School of La Almunia, University of Zaragoza, 50100 La Almunia de Doña Godina, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3007-302X
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

Government of Aragon (Stochastic Models Research group) E46_20RMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2020-116873GB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a newborn with a birth weight for gestational age < 10th percentile. Routine third-trimester ultrasound screening for fetal growth assessment has detection rates (DR) from 50 to 80%. For this reason, the addition of other markers is being studied, such as maternal characteristics, biochemical values, and biophysical models, in order to create personalized combinations that can increase the predictive capacity of the ultrasound. With this purpose, this retrospective cohort study of 12,912 cases aims to compare the potential value of third-trimester screening, based on estimated weight percentile (EPW), by universal ultrasound at 35−37 weeks of gestation, with a combined model integrating maternal characteristics and biochemical markers (PAPP-A and β-HCG) for the prediction of SGA newborns. We observed that DR improved from 58.9% with the EW alone to 63.5% with the predictive model. Moreover, the AUC for the multivariate model was 0.882 (0.873−0.891 95% C.I.), showing a statistically significant difference with EPW alone (AUC 0.864 (95% C.I.: 0.854−0.873)). Although the improvements were modest, contingent detection models appear to be more sensitive than third-trimester ultrasound alone at predicting SGA at delivery.

Indexed as

combined prediction modelestimated percentile weightfetal biometrypregnancy biomarkerssmall for gestational agethird trimester ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35629184
PMCPMC9147008
OpenAlexW4229371149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.