Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35629122›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Electrocardiogram Recommendation System in the Emergency Department.

Dung-Jang Tsai, Shih-Hung Tsai, Hui-Hsun Chiang, Chia-Cheng Lee, Sy-Jou Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Current and Future Use of Artificial Intelligence in Electrocardiography.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dung-Jang TsaiInstitute of Life Sciences, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11499, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5531-0810
Shih-Hung TsaiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11499, Taiwan.
Hui-Hsun ChiangSchool of Nursing, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11499, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7193-5653
Chia-Cheng LeePlanning and Management Office, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.
Sy-Jou ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11499, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2105-7570
Tri-Service General Hospital · TWNational Defense Medical Center · TW

Funding

Medical Affairs Bureau Ministry of National Defense, Taiwan MND-MAB-C11-111041Ter-Zer Foundation for Educational Achievement B1081030Tri-Service General Hospital TSGH-E-111210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The machine learning-assisted electrocardiogram (ECG) is increasingly recognized for its unprecedented capabilities in diagnosing and predicting cardiovascular diseases. Identifying the need for ECG examination early in emergency department (ED) triage is key to timely artificial intelligence-assisted analysis. We used machine learning to develop and validate a clinical decision support tool to predict ED triage patients' need for ECG. Data from 301,658 ED visits from August 2017 to November 2020 in a tertiary hospital were divided into a development cohort, validation cohort, and two test cohorts that included admissions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Models were developed using logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and XGBoost methods. Their areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were compared and validated. In the validation cohort, the AUCs were 0.887 for the XGBoost model, 0.885 for the logistic regression model, 0.878 for the random forest model, and 0.845 for the decision tree model. The XGBoost model was selected for subsequent application. In test cohort 1, the AUC was 0.891, with sensitivity of 0.812, specificity of 0.814, PPV of 0.708 and NPV of 0.886. In test cohort 2, the AUC was 0.885, with sensitivity of 0.816, specificity of 0.812, PPV of 0.659, and NPV of 0.908. In the cumulative incidence analysis, patients not receiving an ECG yet positively predicted by the model had significantly higher probability of receiving the examination within 48 h compared with those negatively predicted by the model. A machine learning model based on triage datasets was developed to predict ECG acquisition with high accuracy. The ECG recommendation can effectively predict whether patients presenting at ED triage will require an ECG, prompting subsequent analysis and decision-making in the ED.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedecision support systemelectrocardiogramemergency departmentmachine learningtriage

Identifiers

PMID35629122
PMCPMC9143094
OpenAlexW4225006206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.