ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Deciding "what" to screen for and "when": The importance of natural history information.American journal of human genetics · 2026Review
- Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- What it Takes to Implement Population-Based Genomic Screening: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Implementation Determinants Across Health Systems.Research square · 2026Article
- Impact of a digital platform on genetic counselling encounters in the screening context.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Views and experiences regarding workplace genetic testing: findings from a national survey of U.S. employees.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Assessing Willingness to Pay for Genetic Testing Among Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Data from the Omnibus Survey 2022.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- North Carolina primary care provider perspectives on expanded genomic screening in children.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Survivors' Responses to an Online Intervention to Promote Discussions of Cancer Genetic Risk with Blood Relatives.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- Ethically Integrating Genomics in Primary Care: An Invitation to Share Implementation Best Practices.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2026Article
- Residual allelic activity likely underlies the low rates of disease expression for predicted loss-of-function variants in population-scale biobanks.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Implementation Mapping to Identify Best Practices for Implementing Population-Wide Genomic Screening Programs: Protocol for the FOCUS (Facilitating the Implementation of Population-Wide Genomic Screening) Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Primary Care Provider Perspectives on Expanded Genomic Screening in Children.Research square · 2025Article
- Trends in Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates in Early-Onset and Older-Onset Age Groups in the United States, 2010-2019.Cancer discovery · 2025Article
- Using large-scale population-based data to improve disease risk assessment of clinical variants.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Chatbot for the Return of Positive Genetic Screening Results for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Prompt Engineering Project.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Adolescents' and young adults' reactions to and perceived utility of carrier screening results in the context of a genomic research study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Workplace perk or pitfall? A qualitative study of genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with workplace genetic testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Design and validation of a clinical whole genome sequencing-based assay for patient screening in a large healthcare system.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Age-Based Genomic Screening: Pediatric Providers' Perspectives on Implementation.Public health genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdvances in clinical genomic sequencing capabilities, including reduced costs and knowledge gains, have bolstered the consideration of genomic screening in healthy adult populations. Yet, little is known about the existing landscape of genomic screening programs in the United States. It can be difficult to find information on current implementation efforts and best practices, particularly in light of critical questions about equity, cost, and benefit.
methodsIn 2020, we searched publicly available information on the Internet and the scientific literature to identify programs and collect information, including: setting, program funding, targeted population, test offered, and patient cost. Program representatives were contacted throughout 2020 and 2021 to clarify, update, and supplement the publicly available information.
resultsTwelve programs were identified. Information was available on key program features, such as setting, genes tested, and target populations. Data on costs, outcomes, or long-term sustainability plans were not always available. Most programs offered testing at no or significantly reduced cost due to generous pilot funding, although the sustainability of these programs remains unknown. Gene testing lists were diverse, ranging from 11 genes (CDC tier 1 genes) to 59 genes (ACMG secondary findings list v.2) to broad exome and genome sequencing. This diversity presents challenges for harmonized data collection and assessment of program outcomes.
conclusionsEarly programs are exploring the logistics and utility of population genomic screening in various settings. Coordinated efforts are needed to take advantage of data collected about uptake, infrastructure, and intervention outcomes to inform future research, evaluation, and program development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.