Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35628930›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Efficacy of 3 Tesla Functional Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence.

Andrea Braga, Fabiana Castronovo, Giorgio Caccia, Andrea Papadia, Luca Regusci, Marco Torella, Stefano Salvatore, Chiara Scancarello, Fabio Ghezzi, Maurizio Serati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea BragaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4877-0640
Fabiana CastronovoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland.
Giorgio CacciaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland.
Andrea PapadiaFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
Luca RegusciDepartment of General Surgery, EOC-Beata Vergine Hospital, 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland.
Marco TorellaDepartment of Gyanecology, Obstetric and Reproductive Science, Second University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Stefano SalvatoreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCSS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Chiara ScancarelloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Del Ponte Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Fabio GhezziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Del Ponte Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Maurizio SeratiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Del Ponte Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy.
Ospedale Regionale di Mendrisio · CHUniversity of Insubria · ITOspedale regionale di Lugano · CHUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) is a new technique for the conservative treatment of Urinary incontinence (UI), based on magnetic induction. It induces controlled depolarization of the nerves, resulting in pelvic muscle contraction and sacral S2-S4 roots neuromodulation. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the new 3 Tesla FMS chair, both in patients with pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and in women with pure overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. A prospective observational study was conducted in our urogynaecologic unit. All the patients involved were consecutive women with pure SUI or pure OAB symptoms treated by a 3 Tesla electromagnetic chair. The primary outcome was a subjective outcome evaluation by the PGI-I Scale and a patient-satisfaction scale. The secondary outcome was the change score of the UDI-6, IIQ-7, ICIQ-SF and OAB-q SF questionnaires from baseline to final visit. At 2 months follow-up, 28 out of 60 patients (47%) with SUI symptoms and 20 out of 40 patients (50%) with OAB symptoms declared themselves cured. Considering cured and improved patients, the subjective cure rates were 68.3% (41/60) and 70% (28/40) for patients with SUI and OAB symptoms, respectively. The results of this study showed that the 3 Tesla electromagnetic chair may be an effective option for the treatment of UI.

Indexed as

chairextracorporeal magnetic innervationfemale urinary incontinencefunctional magnetic stimulationoveractive bladderstress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID35628930
PMCPMC9145499
OpenAlexW4280638651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.