Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35628908›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Custom Massive Allograft in a Case of Pelvic Bone Tumour: Simulation of Processing with Computerised Numerical Control vs. Robotic Machining.

Leonardo Vivarelli, Marco Govoni, Dario Attala, Carmine Zoccali, Roberto Biagini, Dante Dallari

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06380530 (Advanced Surgical Simulation Processes in the Correction of Skeletal Defects and Deformities), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06380530 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Advanced Surgical Simulation Processes in the Correction of Skeletal Defects and Deformities

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2024 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsMusculoskeletal Deformity, Musculoskeletal Abnormalities, Musculoskeletal DisorderArmsDeformity correction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leonardo VivarelliReconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery and Innovative Techniques-Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1112-0262
Marco GovoniReconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery and Innovative Techniques-Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-8101
Dario AttalaDepartment of Oncological Orthopaedics-Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5992-3895
Carmine ZoccaliDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedic Science, University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8847-6772
Roberto BiaginiDepartment of Oncological Orthopaedics, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Dante DallariReconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery and Innovative Techniques-Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-5477
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of massive bone allografts after the resection of bone tumours is still a challenging process. However, to overcome some issues related to the processing procedures and guarantee the best three-dimensional matching between donor and recipient, some tissue banks have developed a virtual tissue database based on the scanning of the available allografts for using their 3D shape during virtual surgical planning (VSP) procedures. To promote the use of future VSP bone-shaping protocols useful for machining applications within a cleanroom environment, in our work, we simulate a massive bone allograft machining with two different machines: a four-axes (computer numerical control, CNC) vs. a five-axes (robot) milling machine. The allograft design was based on a real case of allograft reconstruction after pelvic tumour resection and obtained with 3D Slicer and Rhinoceros software. Machining simulations were performed with RhinoCAM and graphically and mathematically analysed with CloudCompare and R, respectively. In this case, the geometrical differences of the allograft design are not clinically relevant; however, the mathematical analysis showed that the robot performed better than the four-axes machine. The proof-of-concept presented here paves the way towards massive bone allograft cleanroom machining. Nevertheless, further studies, such as the simulation of different types of allografts and real machining on massive bone allografts, are needed.

Indexed as

bone machiningcustom allograftGMP manufacturingmassive allograftpelvic tumoursimulationtumour reconstructionvirtual planning

Identifiers

PMID35628908
PMCPMC9143408
OpenAlexW4280600459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.