ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: The Results of a Naturalistic Outcomes Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- "It's All Under Control" - Description of the Dissociation Between Psychological Symptoms and Autonomic Arousal in People With Obsessive-compulsive Symptoms: A Case-control Study.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2025Observational
- The efficacy of an internet-based cognitive-behavioral program assisted by a new mobile application for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.Dusunen adam : Bakirkoy Ruh ve Sinir Hastaliklari Hastanesi yayin organi · 2025Article
- MAGNITUDE: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Phase II Trial Protocol.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Benefits and barriers associated with using cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat obsessive-compulsive disorder: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Abnormal nonlinear features of EEG microstate sequence in obsessive-compulsive disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Bilateral anterior capsulotomy in a patient with severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: Case report.Current journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Treating Guilt-Inducing Self-Talk in Ocd with Dramatized Socratic Dialogue: A Step by Step Intervention.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive−behavioral therapy is a well-established treatment for obsessive−compulsive disorder (OCD). There are a variety of cognitive and behavioral strategies, and it is necessary to analyze the outcomes of the treatments. The aim of the present study is to verify the effectiveness of a treatment that combines evidence-based procedures and specific cognitive interventions highlighting the issue of acceptance. Forty patients with OCD were recruited and underwent a specific treatment procedure. All patients had a psychodiagnostic assessment for OCD using the Y−BOCS (Yale−Brown obsessive−compulsive scale) performed twice: before treatment (t0) and after nine months (t1). Data analysis showed a decrease in the scores between t0 and t1 according to the Y−BOCS in terms of the interference, severity, and impairment of obsessive−compulsive symptoms. A repeated-measures ANOVA showed a significant reduction in symptoms after treatment, with values of F (1, 39) = 137.56, p < 0.001, and η2 = 0.78. The ANOVA results were corroborated by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A reliable change index analysis indicated that 33 participants reported improvements in symptoms, of which 23 were clinically significant. The results showed clinical relevance for OCD treatment and highlighted how this cognitive procedure favored positive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.