Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35628463›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

How Cell Geometry and Cellular Patterning Influence Tissue Stiffness.

Mateusz Majda, Nicola Trozzi, Gabriella Mosca, Richard S Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The mechanical properties ofScience advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The nonlinear mechanics of highly extensible plant epidermal cell walls.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. SEMAPL bioengineering · 2023
    Article
  10. Cell wall dynamics: novel tools and research questions.Journal of experimental botany · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plant Biomechanics-A Natural Transition from Molecular to Organ Scale.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Mechanosensing, from forces to structures.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mateusz MajdaDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3405-2901
Nicola TrozziDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3951-6533
Gabriella MoscaDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-498X
Richard S SmithDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9220-0787

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell growth in plants occurs due to relaxation of the cell wall in response to mechanical forces generated by turgor pressure. Growth can be anisotropic, with the principal direction of growth often correlating with the direction of lower stiffness of the cell wall. However, extensometer experiments on onion epidermal peels have shown that the tissue is stiffer in the principal direction of growth. Here, we used a combination of microextensometer experiments on epidermal onion peels and finite element method (FEM) modeling to investigate how cell geometry and cellular patterning affects mechanical measurements made at the tissue level. Simulations with isotropic cell-wall material parameters showed that the orientation of elongated cells influences tissue apparent stiffness, with the tissue appearing much softer in the transverse versus the longitudinal directions. Our simulations suggest that although extensometer experiments show that the onion tissue is stiffer when stretched in the longitudinal direction, the effect of cellular geometry means that the wall is in fact softer in this direction, matching the primary growth direction of the cells.

Indexed as

Cell WallMechanical PhenomenaAnisotropybiomechanicscell geometrycell growthcellular patterningFEMfinite element methodmicroextensometermodelingMorphoMechanXMorphoRobotX

Identifiers

PMID35628463
PMCPMC9145195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.