Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35628453›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Exploring Nearest Neighbor Interactions and Their Influence on the Gibbs Energy Landscape of Unfolded Proteins and Peptides.

Reinhard Schweitzer-Stenner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Reinhard Schweitzer-StennerDepartment of Chemistry, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5616-0722

Funding

National Science Foundation CHE 0804492National Science Foundation MCB-1817650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Flory isolated pair hypothesis (IPH) is one of the corner stones of the random coil model, which is generally invoked to describe the conformational dynamics of unfolded and intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). It stipulates, that individual residues sample the entire sterically allowed space of the Ramachandran plot without exhibiting any correlations with the conformational dynamics of its neighbors. However, multiple lines of computational, bioinformatic and experimental evidence suggest that nearest neighbors have a significant influence on the conformational sampling of amino acid residues. This implies that the conformational entropy of unfolded polypeptides and proteins is much less than one would expect based on the Ramachandran plots of individual residues. A further implication is that the Gibbs energies of residues in unfolded proteins or polypeptides are not additive. This review provides an overview of what is currently known and what has yet to be explored regarding nearest neighbor interactions in unfolded proteins.

Indexed as

Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsPeptidesAmino AcidsEntropyMolecular ConformationAmino AcidsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsPeptideschemical shifts and J-couplingconformational entropyisolated pair hypothesisnearest neighbor interactionsunfolded proteins

Identifiers

PMID35628453
PMCPMC9147007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.