ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing protein-protein interactions with thermal proteome profiling.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024Review
- Targeting mitochondrial metabolism by the mitotoxin bromoxib in leukemia and lymphoma cells.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Article
- The Golgi stacking protein GRASP55 is targeted by the natural compound prodigiosin.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023Article
- Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- Toward the analysis of functional proteoforms using mass spectrometry-based stability proteomics.Frontiers in analytical science · 2023Article
- Protein Interactome Profiling of Stable Molecular Complexes in Biomaterial Lysate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemical biology and the application of small molecules has proven to be a potent perturbation strategy, especially for the functional elucidation of proteins, their networks, and regulators. In recent years, the cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) and its proteome-wide extension, thermal proteome profiling (TPP), have proven to be effective tools for identifying interactions of small molecules with their target proteins, as well as off-targets in living cells. Here, we asked the question whether isothermal dose-response (ITDR) CETSA can be exploited to characterize secondary effects downstream of the primary binding event, such as changes in post-translational modifications or protein-protein interactions (PPI). By applying ITDR-CETSA to MAPK14 kinase inhibitor treatment of living HL-60 cells, we found similar dose-responses for the direct inhibitor target and its known interaction partners MAPKAPK2 and MAPKAPK3. Extension of the dose-response similarity comparison to the proteome wide level using TPP with compound concentration range (TPP-CCR) revealed not only the known MAPK14 interaction partners MAPKAPK2 and MAPKAPK3, but also the potentially new intracellular interaction partner MYLK. We are confident that dose-dependent small molecule treatment in combination with ITDR-CETSA or TPP-CCR similarity assessment will not only allow discrimination between primary and secondary effects, but will also provide a novel method to study PPI in living cells without perturbation by protein modification, which we named "small molecule arranged thermal proximity coaggregation" (smarTPCA).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.