ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Basic Science with Preclinical Models to Investigate and Develop Liquid Biopsy: What Are the Available Data and Is It a Fruitful Approach?
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An amplification-free fluorescence turn-on sensing platform for in situ monitoring miRNA release from live cells.Talanta open · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy and Single-Cell Technologies in Maternal-Fetal Medicine: A Scoping Review of Non-Invasive Molecular Approaches.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Innovative Approaches to Early Detection of Cancer-Transforming Screening for Breast, Lung, and Hard-to-Screen Cancers.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Is liquid biopsy the future commutator of decision-making in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma?Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Editorial: The impact of liquid biopsies in the management of liver cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The molecular analysis of circulating analytes (circulating tumor-DNA (ctDNA), -cells (CTCs) and -RNA (ctRNA)/exosomes) deriving from solid tumors and detected in the bloodstream-referred as liquid biopsy-has emerged as one of the most promising concepts in cancer management. Compelling data have evidenced its pivotal contribution and unique polyvalence through multiple applications. These data essentially derived from translational research. Therewith, data on liquid biopsy in basic research with preclinical models are scarce, a concerning lack that has been widely acknowledged in the field. This report aimed to comprehensively review the available data on the topic, for each analyte. Only 17, 17 and 2 studies in basic research investigated ctDNA, CTCs and ctRNA/exosomes, respectively. Albeit rare, these studies displayed noteworthy relevance, demonstrating the capacity to investigate questions related to the biology underlying analytes release that could not be explored via translational research with human samples. Translational, clinical and technological sectors of liquid biopsy may benefit from basic research and should take note of some important findings generated by these studies. Overall, results underscored the need to intensify the efforts to conduct future studies on liquid biopsy in basic research with new preclinical models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.