Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35628096›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Importance of Acknowledging an Intermediate Category of Airway Management Devices in the Prehospital Setting.

Laurent Suppan, Christophe Alain Fehlmann, Loric Stuby, Mélanie Suppan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laurent SuppanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-6421
Christophe Alain FehlmannDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4163-0338
Loric StubyGenève TEAM Ambulances, Emergency Medical Services, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1663-5249
Mélanie SuppanDivision of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8807-9619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prehospital airway devices are often classified as either basic or advanced, with this latter category including both supraglottic airway (SGA) devices and instruments designed to perform endotracheal intubation (ETI). Therefore, many authors analyze the impact of SGA and ETI devices jointly. There are however fundamental differences between these instruments. Indeed, adequate airway protection can only be achieved through ETI, and SGA devices all have relatively low leak pressures which might compromise both oxygenation and ventilation when lung compliance is decreased. In addition, there is increasing evidence that SGA devices reduce carotid blood flow in case of cardiac arrest. Nevertheless, SGA devices might be particularly useful in the prehospital setting where many providers are not experienced enough to safely perform ETI. Compared to basic airway management (bag-valve-mask) devices, SGA devices enable better oxygenation, decrease the odds of aspiration, and allow for more reliable capnometric measurement by virtue of their enhanced airtightness. For all these reasons, we strongly believe that SGA devices should be categorized as "intermediate airway management devices" and be systematically analyzed separately from devices designed to perform ETI.

Indexed as

clinical competenceemergency medical servicesendotracheal intubationi-gellaryngeal mask airwayout-of-hospitalprehospital airway managementsupgraglottic devices

Identifiers

PMID35628096
PMCPMC9141081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.