Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35628064›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Does Self-Directed Learning with Simulation Improve Critical Thinking and Motivation of Nursing Students? A Pre-Post Intervention Study with the MAES© Methodology.

Vanessa Arizo-Luque, Lucía Ramirez-Baena, María José Pujalte-Jesús, María Ángeles Rodríguez-Herrera, Ainhoa Lozano-Molina, Oscar Arrogante, José Luis Díaz-Agea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa Arizo-LuqueNursing Department, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Guadalupe de Maciascoque, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0326-4576
Lucía Ramirez-BaenaRed Cross University Centre for Nursing, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8787-9887
María José Pujalte-JesúsNursing Department, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Guadalupe de Maciascoque, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1523-0285
María Ángeles Rodríguez-HerreraDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7285-0798
Ainhoa Lozano-MolinaUniversity School of Nursing of Ávila, Department of Nursing of the University of Salamanca, 05003 Ávila, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2626-6627
Oscar ArroganteRed Cross University College of Nursing, Spanish Red Cross, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28003 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8304-9093
José Luis Díaz-AgeaNursing Department, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Guadalupe de Maciascoque, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0818-0224
Universidad Católica de Murcia · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation and critical thinking are fundamental for the development of adequate learning. The purpose of the present study was to assess the motivation for learning and critical thinking among nursing students before and after self-directed simulation-based training using the MAES© methodology. A cross-sectional and descriptive quantitative study was conducted with a sample of third-year nursing students. The instruments utilized were the Spanish-adapted version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ-44), and the Critical Thinking for Nursing Professionals Questionnaire (CuPCPE). The students improved their levels both of motivation components, (such as self-efficacy, strategy use, self-regulation) and critical thinking components (such as personal characteristics, intellectual and cognitive abilities, interpersonal abilities and self-management, and technical abilities). These improvements could be a result of the intrinsic characteristics of the MAES© methodology (as a team-based, self-directed, collaborative and peer-to-peer learning method).

Indexed as

critical thinkingMAES methodologymotivationnursing studentssimulation-based education

Identifiers

PMID35628064
PMCPMC9140591
OpenAlexW4280543262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.