ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Socioeconomic Status and Interest in Genetic Testing in a US-Based Sample.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social vulnerability and genetic service utilization among unaffected BRIDGE trial patients with inherited cancer susceptibility.BMC cancer · 2025Trial
- Patient perspectives on testing for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- Perspectives on genomic newborn screening studies: design, implementation, and outcomes.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Solution-Based Research to Address Disparities in Precision Cancer Health: A Case Report Elucidating the Design and Rationale of the Illinois Cancer Health Equity Research (I-CHER) Center.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Psychologically informed reminder messages for promoting BRCA1/2 carrier screening: evidence from a large-scale population-based study.European journal of public health · 2026Observational
- Interest in Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer Risk: Associations with Genetic Familiarity, Self-Efficacy, and Sociodemographics.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- Genetic and Genomic Testing in Cardiovascular Disease: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Provider perceptions and insights on polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer: A qualitative study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Women's preferences for testing to predict breast cancer risk - a discrete choice experiment.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- BRCA genetic testing and counseling in breast cancer: how do we meet our patients' needs?NPJ breast cancer · 2024Review
- Intersectionality,Cancers · 2024Article
- Experiences of Family Communication and Cascade Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer in Medically Underserved Populations-A Qualitative Study.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
- Diversity of thought: public perceptions of genetic testing across ethnic groups in the UK.Journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Urban-Rural and Socioeconomic Differences in Patient Knowledge and Perceptions of Genomic Tumor Testing.JCO precision oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is a significant burden, particularly to individuals of low socioeconomic status (SES). Genetic testing can provide information about an individual's risk of developing cancer and guide future screening and preventative services. However, there are significant financial barriers, particularly for individuals of low SES. This study used the Early Detection of Genetic Risk (EDGE) Study's patient baseline survey (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.