Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627966›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Microsurgical Reconstruction of Foot Defects: A Case Series with Long-Term Follow-Up.

David Breidung, Panagiotis Fikatas, Patrick Mandal, Maresa D Berns, Andrè A Barth, Moritz Billner, Ioannis-Fivos Megas, Bert Reichert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David BreidungDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Center for Severe Burn Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2966-2863
Panagiotis FikatasDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0703-8207
Patrick MandalDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Center for Severe Burn Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8256-1837
Maresa D BernsDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Center for Severe Burn Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.
Andrè A BarthDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Center for Severe Burn Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.
Moritz BillnerDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Center for Severe Burn Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.
Ioannis-Fivos MegasDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Center for Severe Burn Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1627-8002
Bert ReichertDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Center for Severe Burn Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nürnberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6003-9180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Microsurgical reconstruction of foot defects with free flaps is rare as it is a challenging task for a surgeon. For extensive defects, advanced surgical procedures, such as free flap transfer with microsurgical anastomosis, may be the last chance to avoid major amputation. The aim of the study was to examine the opportunities and risks posed by free flap reconstruction of foot defects and to illustrate in which situations reconstruction is useful on the basis of case characteristics. (2) Methods: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed data of cases with free flap reconstruction of the foot from 2007 to 2022. Therefore, demographic data, comorbidities, information about the defect situation, data on the operational procedure, and complications were evaluated. (3) Results: A total of 27 cases with free flap coverage of foot defects could be included. In 24 of these cases (89%), defect coverage was successful. In 18 patients, some form of complication occurred in the postoperative stage. The most frequently used flap was the latissimus dorsi flap, with 13 procedures. (4) Conclusions: Foot reconstruction using free flaps is a proven procedure for the treatment of larger foot defects and can offer a predominantly good functional outcome. The lengthy process and possible complications should be thoroughly discussed in advance so as to provide criteria, suitably adjusted to the individual prerequisites of the patients, for deciding whether limb salvage using advanced surgical procedures should be attempted.

Indexed as

footfree flaplimb salvagemicrosurgeryreconstructive surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID35627966
PMCPMC9141605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.