ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Control Measures in the Emergency Department: The Role of Rapid Antigenic Testing in Asymptomatic Subjects.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hidden SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infections in Young Children: What Routine Tests Do Not Tell.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- Integrating SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in maternal, neonatal and child health, HIV and tuberculosis services in Cameroon and Kenya: a cluster randomised trial of two testing models.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- PCR combined with serologic testing improves the yield and efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 infection hunting: A study in 40,689 consecutive overseas arrivals.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Toward a Home Test for COVID-19 Diagnosis: DNA Machine for Amplification-Free SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Clinical Samples.ChemMedChem · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limiting transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from asymptomatic people assumes the paramount importance of keeping fragile subjects protected. We evaluated the utility of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in asymptomatic subjects attending emergency departments in non-COVID-19 areas, using a single nasopharyngeal swab specimen collected in universal transport medium to perform both rapid antigen testing and rRT-PCR (used as reference standard) in a cohort of 899 patients. In the overall sample, the rapid antigen test had 43.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, 93.6% negative predictive value. Considering subjects with rRT-PCR cycle threshold ≤30, the test had 80.4% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, 98.8% negative predictive value. Considering subjects with rRT-PCR cycle threshold ≤25, the test had 94.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value and 99.7% negative predictive value. Despite low sensitivity, routine application of rapid antigen testing in the emergency department can lead to isolation in less than 30 min of about a half of asymptomatic COVID-19 subjects assigned to non-COVID-19 areas by clinical triage. The rapid test correctly identified 94.7% of asymptomatic patients with cycle threshold ≤ 25 that are supposed to be more infective; thus, it could be a useful measure to contain viral transmission in non-COVID-19 areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.