Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627895›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Physical Activity Capacity Assessment of Patients with Chronic Disease and the Six-Minute Walk Test: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Edem Allado, Mathias Poussel, Eliane Albuisson, Jean Paysant, Margaux Temperelli, Oriane Hily, Anthony Moussu, Noura Benhajji, Gerôme C Gauchard, Bruno Chenuel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Edem AlladoUniversity Center of Sports Medicine and Adapted Physical Activity, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1760-6979
Mathias PousselUniversity Center of Sports Medicine and Adapted Physical Activity, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4386-8606
Eliane AlbuissonDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, CHRU-Nancy, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1490-7549
Jean PaysantDevAH, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Margaux TemperelliUniversity Center of Sports Medicine and Adapted Physical Activity, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Oriane HilyUniversity Center of Sports Medicine and Adapted Physical Activity, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Anthony MoussuUniversity Center of Sports Medicine and Adapted Physical Activity, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Noura BenhajjiOMEOS, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Gerôme C GauchardDevAH, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Bruno ChenuelUniversity Center of Sports Medicine and Adapted Physical Activity, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) to determine the physical activity capacities of patients with chronic disease. Methods: For this cross-sectional study, we investigated 156 patients with chronic disease and no beta-blocker treatment. They systematically performed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test to determine their heart rate peak (HRPeak) and maximal oxygen uptake (V’O2max). We considered two groups of patients based upon the results of the functional evaluation of exercise performance: (1) No limitation in exercise performance (V’O2max greater or equal to 80% of the theoretical reference) and (2) limited exercise performance (V’O2max less than 80% of the theoretical value). All patients also received a 6MWT on the same day as the exercise test. Results: We found 68 (43.6%) patients with normal exercise capacities and 88 (56.4%) patients with limited exercise performance. In this sample, 6MWT mean distances were 510 (87) and 506 (86) m, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups for distance and end-test heart rate. The correlation between matrix V’O2max measured during the maximal incremental exercise test and the 6MWT distance displayed a positive slope (r = 0.549 CI95 [0.431−0.656]—p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our results showed a moderate relationship between 6MWT and physical activity capacity for patients with chronic disease.

Indexed as

chronic diseaseexercisehumanphysical conditioningsedentary behaviorwalk test

Identifiers

PMID35627895
PMCPMC9141940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.