Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627808›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Anticancer Treatment Goals and Prognostic Misperceptions among Advanced Cancer Outpatients.

Carlos Eduardo Paiva, Ana Clara Teixeira, Bruna Minto Lourenço, Daniel D'Almeida Preto, Talita Caroline de Oliveira Valentino, Mirella Mingardi, Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Timing of prognostic discussions in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos Eduardo PaivaPalliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group, Post-Graduate Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7934-1451
Ana Clara TeixeiraPalliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group, Post-Graduate Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil.
Bruna Minto LourençoPalliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group, Post-Graduate Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil.
Daniel D'Almeida PretoPalliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group, Post-Graduate Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-7322
Talita Caroline de Oliveira ValentinoPalliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group, Post-Graduate Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil.
Mirella MingardiPalliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group, Post-Graduate Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil.
Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro PaivaPalliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group, Post-Graduate Program, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos 14784-400, SP, Brazil.
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: In the context of cancer incurability, the communication processes involving clinicians and patients with cancer are frequently complex. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study that investigated outpatients with advanced cancers and their oncologists. Both were interviewed immediately after a medical appointment in which there was disease progression and/or clinical deterioration, and were asked about the patient’s chance of curability and the goals of the prescribed cancer treatment. The patients were asked whether they would like to receive information about prognosis and how they would like to receive it. The analyses of agreement on perceptions were performed using the Kappa’s test. (3) Results: the sample consisted of 90 patients and 28 oncologists. Seventy-eight (87.6%) patients answered that they wanted their oncologist to inform them about their prognosis; only 35.2% (n = 31) of them said they received such information at their present appointment. Regarding how they would prefer prognostic disclosure, 61.8% (n = 55) mentioned that the oncologist should consider ways to keep the patient’s hope up; 73% (n = 65) of the patients reported odds >50% of cure. The agreement between oncologists’ and their patients’ perceptions regarding the treatment goals and curability was slight (k = 0.024 and k = 0.017, respectively). (4) Conclusions: The perceptions of patients and their oncologists regarding the goals of treatment and their chances of cure were in disagreement. New approaches are needed to improve the communication process between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOutpatientsCross-Sectional StudiesGoalsHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsPrognosiscancercommunicationpalliative careperception of curabilityprognostic markers

Identifiers

PMID35627808
PMCPMC9141160
OpenAlexW4281261370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.