Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627731›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Systematic Literature Review on Indicators Use in Safety Management Practices among Utility Industries.

Mohamad Xazaquan Mansor Ali, Kadir Arifin, Azlan Abas, Mohd Akhir Ahmad, Muhammad Khairil, Muhammad Basir Cyio, Muhammad Ahsan Samad, Ilyas Lampe, Mahfudz Mahfudz, Muhammad Nur Ali

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamad Xazaquan Mansor AliCentre for Research in Development, Social and Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43650, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9563-5900
Kadir ArifinCentre for Research in Development, Social and Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43650, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7119-4525
Azlan AbasCentre for Research in Development, Social and Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43650, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-6506
Mohd Akhir AhmadCentre for Research in Development, Social and Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43650, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6104-5208
Muhammad KhairilFaculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Tadulako, Palu 94118, Indonesia.
Muhammad Basir CyioFaculty of Agriculture, Universitas Tadulako, Palu 94118, Indonesia.
Muhammad Ahsan SamadFaculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Tadulako, Palu 94118, Indonesia.
Ilyas LampeFaculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Tadulako, Palu 94118, Indonesia.
Mahfudz MahfudzFaculty of Agriculture, Universitas Tadulako, Palu 94118, Indonesia.
Muhammad Nur AliFaculty of Agriculture, Universitas Tadulako, Palu 94118, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorkers in utility industries are exposed to occupational accidents due to inadequate safety management systems. Accordingly, it is necessary to characterize and compare the available literature on indicators used in safety management practices in the utility industries.

methodsThe systematic literature review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement. This study considered 25 related studies from Web of Science and Scopus databases.

resultsFurther review of these articles resulted in three mains performance indicators; namely, driven leading indicators, observant leading indicators, and lagging indicators consisting of 15 sub-indicators.

conclusionsFuture studies should consider researching a more comprehensive range of utility industries, measuring subjective and objective indicators, integrating risk management into safety management practices, and validating the influence of leading indicators on safety outcomes. Further, researchers recommend including accidents, fatalities, lost time injuries, and near misses in safety outcomes.

Indexed as

IndustrySafety ManagementAccidents, OccupationalHumansOrganizationsRisk Managementlagging indicatorsleading indicatorsoccupational safety and healthsafety management practicessafety performance

Identifiers

PMID35627731
PMCPMC9140665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.