Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627513›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Communication Disparities between Nursing Home Team Members.

Timothy W Farrell, Jorie M Butler, Gail L Towsley, Jacqueline S Telonidis, Katherine P Supiano, Caroline E Stephens, Nancy M Nelson, Alisyn L May, Linda S Edelman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy W FarrellDivision of Geriatrics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, AB 193 SOM, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0070-8757
Jorie M ButlerDivision of Geriatrics, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, AB 193 SOM, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Gail L TowsleyCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-9558
Jacqueline S TelonidisCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Katherine P SupianoCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Caroline E StephensCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Nancy M NelsonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Alisyn L MayCollege of Pharmacy, University of Utah, 30 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Linda S EdelmanCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Improving Palliative Care Access Through Technology (ImPAcTT): A Multi-Component Pilot StudyK76AG054862 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI STEPHENS, CAROLINE · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
HRSA HHS U1QHP28741NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NIA NIH HHS K76 AG054862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal care in nursing home (NH) settings requires effective team communication. Certified nursing assistants (CNAs) interact with nursing home residents frequently, but the extent to which CNAs feel their input is valued by other team members is not known. We conducted a cross-sectional study in which we administered a communication survey within 20 Utah nursing home facilities to 650 team members, including 124 nurses and 264 CNAs. Respondents used a 4-point scale to indicate the extent to which their input is valued by other team members when reporting their concerns about nursing home residents. We used a one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction. When compared to nurses, CNAs felt less valued (CNA mean = 2.14, nurse mean = 3.24; p < 0.001) when reporting to physicians, and less valued (CNA mean = 1.66, nurse mean = 2.71; p < 0.001) when reporting to pharmacists. CNAs did not feel less valued than nurses (CNA mean = 3.43, nurse mean = 3.37; p = 0.25) when reporting to other nurses. Our findings demonstrate that CNAs feel their input is not valued outside of nursing, which could impact resident care. Additional research is needed to understand the reasons for this perception and to design educational interventions to improve the culture of communication in nursing home settings.

Indexed as

Nursing AssistantsNursing HomesCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSkilled Nursing Facilitiescare coordinationinterprofessional communicationlong-term carenurse staffingnursing hometeamwork

Identifiers

PMID35627513
PMCPMC9141434
OpenAlexW4280530410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.