Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627465›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Assessing Physical Fitness of Athletes in a Confined Environment during Prolonged Self-Isolation: Potential Usefulness of the Test of Maximal Number of Burpees Performed in 3 Minutes.

Joshua Qi Jun Tai, Shu Fen Wong, Steve Kin Ming Chow, Darine Hui Wen Choo, Hui Cheng Choo, Sofyan Sahrom, Abdul Rashid Aziz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua Qi Jun TaiSport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Sport Singapore, Singapore 397630, Singapore.
Shu Fen WongSport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Sport Singapore, Singapore 397630, Singapore.
Steve Kin Ming ChowSport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Sport Singapore, Singapore 397630, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1390-2161
Darine Hui Wen ChooSport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Sport Singapore, Singapore 397630, Singapore.
Hui Cheng ChooSport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Sport Singapore, Singapore 397630, Singapore.
Sofyan SahromSport Physiology, Sport Science, National Youth Sport Institute, Singapore 397778, Singapore.
Abdul Rashid AzizSport Science and Sport Medicine, Singapore Sport Institute, Sport Singapore, Singapore 397630, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7727-7484
Nanjing Sport Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to a prolonged period of quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to monitor the physical condition of athletes isolated at home with a fitness tool that measures various aspects of physical fitness, which does not require any special equipment, and can be performed within a small space. This study assessed the reliability and validity of the test of performing the maximal number of burpees in 3 min (or 3-MBT) to monitor strength, power, and aerobic endurance in trained athletes. For Part I (reliability of the 3-MBT), 20 (10 male, 10 female) national athletes from various sports performed the 3-MBT on two separate test sessions. Athletes performed as many burpees as possible within 3 min and the primary performance criteria was the number of burpees completed (where a higher number reflected a better performance). The 3-MBT displayed excellent relative reliability in the athletes, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV %) of >0.92, and <3.0%, respectively. For Part II (validity of the 3-MBT), 40 (20 M, 20 F) athletes performed the 3-MBT, and the countermovement jump (CMJ), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), seated medicine ball throw (SMBT), isometric bench (IBP) and maximal aerobic power (VO2max) tests on separate sessions. When data of male and female athletes were pooled, there were significant correlations between relative 3-MBT and relative CMJ height (r = 0.65, large; p < 0.001), relative IMPT peak force (r = 0.50, large; p < 0.001), relative IBP peak force (r = 0.36, moderate, p = 0.02), and relative VO2max (r = 0.50, large; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the 3-MBT is a reliable and reasonably useful test and is a valid assessment of lower body power and strength, upper body strength and aerobic fitness in trained male and female athletes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Muscle StrengthAthletesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPhysical FitnessReproducibility of Results3-MBTCOVID-19home-based testingisolationmaximal exercisequarantinedself-testing tool

Identifiers

PMID35627465
PMCPMC9142106
OpenAlexW4280636234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.